Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board asks staff to recheck updated copyrights for two ELA vendors before final adoption
Summary
After committee recommendations on K–2 and 3–6 English language arts materials, the board directed staff to revisit revised 2025 copyrights from Amplify/OpenUp (OpenUp EL Education) and report back before final action, citing new materials and state early‑literacy rule questions.
The school board on Tuesday directed district instructional staff to re‑evaluate updated publisher materials related to two English language arts requests for proposal (RFPs) before the board’s final adoption vote.
Adam McMickle, the district’s executive director of student achievement, presented committee recommendations for literacy and English language development curriculum. Committees recommended MyView Literacy (SABAS) for K–2, OpenUp EL Education (OpenUp) for grades 3–6, CommonLit 360 for grades 7–12, and VISTA for K–6 English language development, with scoring and comparative notes presented to the board.
Board members raised a procedural concern after staff learned that OpenUp and Amplify had updated 2025 copyrights and that state guidance tied to SB 127 had been interpreted differently by vendors. Vice President Anderson proposed, and board member Petersen made a motion, to send the two RFPs (RFP 25005 and RFP 25003) back to the committees so the updated vendor materials could be reviewed with the committee evidence before the board’s final decision. The motion passed unanimously.
Why it matters: curriculum adoptions set district instructional materials and professional learning priorities for multiple years. Board members said they wanted to remove uncertainty and ensure committee recommendations reflect the most current published materials, especially in the early literacy space.
What the board asked staff to do
- Reopen committee review for OpenUp (EL Education) and Amplify to examine revised 2025 copyrights and any material changes relevant to SB 127 (early‑literacy requirements).
- Return committee findings and any revised scoring to the board before the scheduled adoption vote so the board could act with full information.
Implementation and timing
McMickle said the district could complete the committee revisit without delaying implementation timelines or training for grades 7–12 and English language development materials already recommended; revisiting K–2 and 3–6 materials would push final board action on those bundles into April but would not change the planned summer training and purchasing windows. The district also noted that vendor pricing and final student counts will be confirmed after staffing and student projections are finalized.
Ending
Board members emphasized the importance of curriculum selection and asked staff to make the committee reconvening the first priority so a final, evidence‑backed recommendation can be made at the next meeting.
