Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Use Of Force topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House panel adopts amendment clarifying "perceive" standard in deadly-force law; bill sent to General Register

2859184 · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Public Safety Committee adopted an amendment to House File 538 that inserts "or perceive" into the deadly-force statute language; the bill as amended was re-referred to the General Register.

The House Public Safety Committee on April 2 adopted an amendment to House File 538 that clarifies how officers may evaluate the use of deadly force under state law and re‑referred the bill to the General Register.

The A2 amendment inserts the phrase "or perceive" into the use-of-deadly-force statute and, according to supporters, aligns statutory language with judicial precedent about evaluating an officer's perspective at the time of an incident rather than with the benefit of hindsight. Representative Steer moved the amendment and the committee adopted it by voice vote. The committee later voted to recommend House File 538 as amended to the General Register.

Why it matters: Supporters said the change provides clarity for officers and communities and mirrors the standard courts apply when reviewing force cases. Imran Ali, general counsel for the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association, told the committee the amendment will promote uniform application of the statute across Minnesota’s 87 counties and bring the statute into alignment with Graham v. Connor, the U.S. Supreme Court decision on force.

Committee debate and context: Chair members and Representative Steer characterized the A2 amendment as intended to reflect legislative intent rather than to change outcomes. One committee member put the intent on the record, saying that subdivision language should be evaluated from the perspective of a reasonable officer "based on the totality of the circumstances known to or perceived by the officer at that time, rather than with the benefit of hindsight." Supporters, including law enforcement representatives, said the amendment was developed with input from the Chiefs of Police Association and unions.

Outcome and next steps: The committee adopted the A2 amendment by voice vote and recommended House File 538, as amended, to be re‑referred to the General Register.

Sources and attribution: Representative Steer moved the amendment; Imran Ali testified for the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association; an unidentified committee member read legislative intent on the record. Exact quotes and attributions appear in the committee transcript.