Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Markers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Westminster Cemetery 250th plaque application reaches national review; missing burial records slow approval

2857810 · April 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A private nonprofit managing Westminster Cemetery said the cemetery's application for a 250th‑anniversary plaque has been submitted to national reviewers but is delayed because burial documentation for three Revolutionary War servicemen is missing; staff and volunteers are working to supply alternative proof of service.

Representatives of the private nonprofit that manages Westminster Cemetery told the Historic District Commission that a 250th‑anniversary plaque application has been submitted to national reviewers and is under review, but the application flagged missing burial documentation for three Revolutionary War servicemen interred in the cemetery.

The cemetery’s representatives said the three veterans were buried before permanent deed records existed at the site; the cemetery was not formally organized or incorporated until 1864, and early burials predate available deed and burial registers. Staff and local volunteers confirmed the headstones display birth and death dates but the cemetery lacks formal burial register entries for those interments. The national reviewers have asked for burial documentation; staff said they will provide other forms of proof of service where available and noted that service records confirming Revolutionary War service do exist for the individuals.

Commission member Kathy (who performed local research) was thanked in the meeting for research assistance on the three veterans; staff said the cemetery will continue to compile documentary evidence and will notify the commission when the national review outcome is available.

Ending: The application remains under national review; staff and volunteers are seeking alternate documentation to meet the reviewers’ requirements.