Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission debates land‑use categories, densities, parking and "design" language for Orem general plan
Summary
Commissioners discussed how to define residential density, parking standards, and the role of an "urban design" chapter in the draft general plan; staff said many detailed maps and datasets are available but may be older and need updating.
Orem planning commissioners used their April 2 work session to probe how the general plan should treat land-use categories, residential densities, parking and the language used for design goals.
Staff read the state land-use requirements and listed the plan's existing categories. Commissioners said some categories on the current future land-use map are too broad; several asked that schools, parks and Utah Valley University be shown distinctly on a future map rather than blended into a single residential color.
Commissioners pressed staff for measurable density targets. "Unit per acre is pretty critical for general plans," one commissioner said. Staff agreed to provide gross-density calculations from GIS and to propose numeric ranges (for example, low, medium and high density expressed as units per acre) that the commission could adopt.
Parking and design drew sustained attention. Commissioners said parking should be treated as an explicit consideration in housing and high-density areas so developers and reviewers know expectations early in the process. "If you walk through the door and somebody says, 'don't forget parking,' that's gonna stick with you," a planning member said.
The group also debated whether the introductory language should use the term "urban design" or a more plain-language phrase such as "thoughtful design" or "built environment." Several commissioners worried the term "urban" could be politically loaded; others said "urban design" is a standard planning term for the public realm and streetscapes and could remain if the plan later includes a matching chapter with measurable standards.
Planners and commissioners discussed accessory dwelling units, prefabricated or "tiny" homes, and the use of planned-development (PD/PRD) tools. Staff noted PRDs are variable by design and suggested clustering techniques could preserve open-space features while allowing site-specific flexibility.
On annexation and mapping, staff noted the city keeps an annexation policy and identified the large remaining area southwest of the temple and a strip near Geneva Road as locations the commission should watch. Commissioners said any future annexation or rezoning should be supported by the same density and infrastructure metrics being requested for built-up areas.
Why it matters: the general plan's land-use definitions will guide future zoning, site reviews and capital planning. Commissioners said numeric density ranges, clear maps that distinguish public facilities and an upfront parking policy will make future land-use decisions more consistent and defensible.
Staff said they will draft recommended units-per-acre ranges, update available maps where possible and circulate the materials ahead of the next land-use discussion.
