Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Las Vegas approves franchise amendment with Republic Services and adopts ordinance changing solid-waste CPI language and rates
Summary
The City Council approved a third amendment to its solid-waste franchise with Republic Services and adopted an ordinance updating the CPI definition used to adjust trash rates, council members said the changes align North Las Vegas with other Valley jurisdictions.
The North Las Vegas City Council on April 2 approved a third amendment to the city's franchise agreement with Republic Services and adopted Ordinance No. 3231, which revises the consumer price index definition used for solid-waste rate adjustments.
The change to the franchise agreement, presented by Jennifer Lasovich of Republic Services, moves the contract to a water, sewer and trash CPI index the company said better reflects the solid-waste industry. "It'll bring you into parity and consistency with the other jurisdictions by putting us on the water, sewer, and trash, CPI index," Lasovich told the council. She thanked city staff for multiple meetings and said the amendment also strengthens partnership provisions important to the city.
Mayor Pro Tem and council members asked no substantive follow-up questions during the presentation and moved to approve the amendment. The council then passed Ordinance No. 3231, which amends Chapter 8.2 of the North Las Vegas Municipal Code to update the CPI definition and associated solid-waste management rates.
City staff and the Republic Services team said the contractual update is intended to align rate adjustments across jurisdictions and reflect industry costs more accurately. The transcript does not record a roll-call vote count for either the franchise amendment or the ordinance; meeting minutes show motions were made and the motions passed.
The ordinance and contract amendment will affect how future rate changes are calculated; specific dollar impacts on residential or commercial rates were not provided during the meeting.
The council approved the motions during the April 2 meeting after the public presentations and staff discussion. No legal challenge, appeal, or effective date for the ordinance was stated on the record during the meeting.
Details: Motion language taken from the meeting transcript and council action. Vote tallies and individual member votes were not recorded in the public transcript excerpts provided.
