Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Criminal Negligence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee holds omnibus traffic and negligent-driving bill (HB883) for further review amid concerns about jail penalties
Summary
A package of traffic-related measures combined in House Bill 883 was discussed at length; members raised concerns that one provision could create jail penalties for non-injury negligent driving, and the bill was held for further work.
The committee reviewed House Bill 883, an omnibus bill that combines several previously introduced measures addressing reckless and negligent driving, must-appear requirements for certain traffic offenses, and related changes.
Members spent substantial time on a provision (drafted from Delegate Williams' language) that would create a new offense of criminal negligence in operation of a motor vehicle with a maximum jail term of six months where the conduct met a gross-deviation standard but did not result in a physical injury. Delegate Moon and others expressed concern that the draft lacked an injury threshold that typically accompanies jail penalties in adjacent statutes and that the new language could make many non‑injury driving incidents potentially jailable.
Other delegates explained the bill's intent in part to close a perceived gap between reckless driving (a payable offense in many cases) and more serious vehicular-homicide or vehicular-manslaughter charges. Advocates of a "must appear" requirement said it would force defendants charged with reckless driving in certain fatality cases to appear in court rather than simply pay a citation.
After extended floor discussion that included examples and policy concerns, the chair said the bill would be held for further work to resolve questions about distinctions among criminal negligence, vehicular manslaughter, and reckless driving, as well as whether the new criminal-negligence provision should impose jail time in the absence of injury.
The committee did not vote on HB 883 during this session and will revisit the proposal after further drafting and review.
