Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Meals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee approves bill to let caretakers receive meals at summer meal sites
Summary
The Senate Education Committee voted to pass SB 225 to the Appropriations Committee. The bill would allow caretakers who accompany children to federally funded summer meal sites to receive meals, proponents say, and drew both support from food-bank and labor groups and limited opposition raising questions about scope and state role.
Senator Bill McNerney introduced SB 225 on April 2, asking the Senate Education Committee to allow caretakers who accompany children to federally funded summer meal sites to receive a meal when the child is served. The committee voted to pass the measure to the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Supporters told the committee that the bill would reduce family food insecurity by making it possible for parents and other caregivers to eat with children at summer meal sites. Becky Silva of the California Association of Food Banks said families lose nutrition when school is out and that giving caregivers meals helps children eat and can encourage family bonding. Several labor and anti-poverty groups, including SEIU California, NextGen California and Western Center on Law and Poverty, said they supported the legislation.
Opponents raised broader questions about the state’s role in providing food outside the school day. David Bullock, speaking in opposition, said he and others worry about expanding education-era services into general family support and argued some needs should be met by families or social services rather than through schools.
Committee members discussed practical and policy issues. Senator Laird and others described examples of child food insecurity over summer and during the pandemic, and pressed the case that existing programs did not fully meet needs. Senator Ochoa Boggs expressed concern about whether school kitchens and staff have capacity and whether programs such as CalFresh or federal Summer EBT ("Sun Bucks") already address family needs; she said she supported the bill in principle but would abstain because of concerns about implementation and infrastructure. Senator Choi and Senator Cabaldon urged better coordination across agencies and programs and asked staff to consider how to center services on people rather than on agency silos.
McNerney and supporters said SB 225 would rely on the existing federal summer meals infrastructure and reimburse caretakers where the program already operates, rather than require new kitchens or new facilities.
The committee recorded the motion to send SB 225 to the Senate Appropriations Committee. The clerk announced the bill would move forward with six ayes and no noes on the record.
