County attorneys seek statutory fix to allow maltreatment findings when abuse occurs out of state
Loading...
Summary
A bill to clarify that Minnesota counties can investigate and secure maltreatment determinations for incidents involving Minnesota children that occurred in other states was presented and the committee moved the measure toward Human Services for further consideration.
County attorneys told the House Children and Families Committee that a statutory clarification is needed so Minnesota social‑service agencies and hearing officers can uphold maltreatment findings when the alleged maltreatment occurred while a Minnesota child was temporarily out of state.
Why it matters: a maltreatment finding that remains available in Minnesota’s records can restrict an offender’s ability to hold child‑facing roles (for example as a coach or childcare provider). County attorneys said judges have overturned some local determinations citing lack of jurisdiction when the alleged misconduct took place outside Minnesota.
Case example and rationale
Janet Reiter, Chisago County attorney, described a case in which a child was abused while the family was in Florida. She said county social services in Minnesota investigated, found maltreatment and made a maltreatment determination. When the subject appealed, a human services judge overturned the determination for lack of jurisdiction even though the child and family reside in Minnesota. Reiter said the proposed language would clarify authority for Minnesota welfare agencies to investigate and for hearing officers to adjudicate these appeals so that maltreatment findings made by local agencies can be sustained.
Committee action
Representative Pinto explained that the Human Services Committee had asked that the bill be routed to Human Services, and the chair moved to re‑refer House File 13607 to the Human Services Committee. Later in the hearing, committee members decided to lay the bill over while additional review and consultation continued.
Ending
Sponsors argued the change would close a gap in current statute, allowing local agencies to protect Minnesota children and uphold maltreatment findings even when the underlying conduct occurred out‑of‑state. Committee staff and county attorneys said they expect a relatively small number of affected cases but said the change is important to ensure consistent protection and access to services.
