Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water And Sewer Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Porterville council directs staff to draft financial-assistance program for irrigation meters; nonprofits prioritized
Summary
Council gave staff direction to create a two-part program to help nonprofit organizations and commercial properties install separate irrigation meters to prevent sewer charges for irrigation water. Council directed staff to return draft resolutions and prioritized a $100,000 nonprofit grant pilot.
Porterville City Council directed staff on April 1 to develop a two-part financial assistance program to help separate irrigation meters for nonprofit and commercial customers — a measure intended to reduce sewer charges that arise from mixed metering.
Background: Council discussion followed a staff presentation explaining how landscape irrigation that flows through a property’s primary water meter can increase sewage billing. Staff proposed a program that would (1) fully fund nonprofit applicants as a grant (no repayment) using general‑fund sources and (2) offer commercial accounts a low‑interest or installment loan through the water replacement fund for meter installation.
Council direction: After extended debate about funding sources and workload, the council asked staff to bring back two separate draft resolutions: one establishing a nonprofit grant program and another establishing a commercial loan program. The council agreed to prioritize nonprofits and directed staff to prepare an item showing options to make an initial nonprofit pilot fund available (council discussion landed on a $100,000 target for initial capitalization). For commercial accounts the council asked staff to structure a 0% interest, three‑year repayment option funded from the water replacement fund and to return detailed cost estimates and implementation steps; Councilmembers discussed a pilot cap (roughly 30% of estimated eligible costs) to limit initial exposure.
Why it matters: Separating irrigation from sanitary flows can substantially lower sewer charges for affected churches, nonprofit facilities and some commercial sites. The proposal would use municipal funds to support conservation and affordability objectives; staff signaled workload and timing constraints tied to the program rollout and reporting.
What’s next: Staff will prepare two draft resolutions (nonprofit grant and commercial loan) that specify eligibility, program caps, proposed funding source (special purposes reserve vs. budget stabilization vs. Measure I) and administrative processes. Council asked that the nonprofit pilot be ready for near‑term implementation prior to summer billing increases.
