Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renter Protections Commissions Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge stronger renter enforcement and question commission spending at Glendale council meeting
Summary
Speakers during public comment asked the council to strengthen renter protections and legal enforcement and questioned city funding for commissions, suggesting funds be redirected to public safety; one speaker described specific landlord conduct and urged a legal advocate for the city's rental-rights program.
During the April 1 oral communications period several residents urged the council to strengthen enforcement of rental-rights protections, provide legal assistance for tenants, and reconsider the level of city funding directed to appointed commissions.
Beth Brooks, who identified recent disputes with a landlord, urged the council to provide an attorney for the city’s rental-rights program and to establish stronger enforcement mechanisms and a rental registry so tenants can pursue remedies. "You have the Girls Inc. ... there are a lot of places that can inspire and uplift," Brooks said, arguing that city money should instead fund legal enforcement for tenants and a rental registry to underwrite enforcement staff.
Mike Mohill urged the council to cut or reduce funding for commissions he said duplicate work done by private groups and argued the city should prioritize hiring police officers instead. "Save us $200,000, please, and let us buy hire some cops," Mohill said, adding his view that private organizations could perform services currently funded through commissions.
Other public comments touched on the Stop Sign installation dispute on Adams Street; the speaker who raised that issue alleged the mayor had unilaterally caused a traffic sign installation (the record shows the matter was decided by council and that staff and the mayor later engaged with the resident). The mayor and staff indicated follow-up steps to review handicap access and potential sign relocation.
No formal council action on renter enforcement or commission funding was taken at the meeting; council members acknowledged the concerns and referred the issues to appropriate staff and to future budget discussions.
