Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retiree Health Coverage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee hears bill to let spouses keep state retiree coverage if retiree goes on Medicaid
Summary
A bill sponsored by Senator Wicklund would allow spouses who were dependents on a state retiree's health plan to continue buying coverage if the retiree stops their plan for reasons other than death, a change prompted by a Richfield constituent with ALS.
Senator Wicklund introduced Senate File 2668 on April 1, asking the committee to consider a change to the State Retiree Health Plan that would allow a surviving or dependent spouse to continue purchasing retiree insurance if the retiree discontinues coverage for reasons other than death.
The bill grew out of a constituent request from Richfield. Mark Schoenbaum, a retired state employee who testified by Zoom, described his situation: "A couple years ago, I was diagnosed with ALS," he said. "If I exhaust my resources ... and go on Medicaid, my group insurance would end and my wife would get kicked off her coverage because of my disability." Schoenbaum said the proposed bill "adds an exception for spouses in situations like ours, allowing them to continue purchasing retiree insurance." He noted the retiree plan is fully funded by retiree premiums and not subsidized by the state.
The nut graf: The bill would change eligibility rules in state retiree health coverage so a spouse who was a dependent on the retiree's policy at the time the retiree loses coverage could continue to buy coverage, even when the retiree's loss of coverage is due to entering Medicaid rather than death. Proponents say the change would preserve continuity of coverage for spouses facing medical and financial uncertainty.
Committee members had few questions. Senator Whitcomb commented the issue appeared straightforward and reiterated that the plan is paid for by retiree premiums. The chair laid the bill over for possible inclusion in an omnibus bill.
Background and context: Under current Minnesota law, spouse continuation rights typically apply when a retiree dies. Testimony on April 1 stressed a gap in protections when a retiree ends coverage for other reasons, such as transitioning to Medicaid because of catastrophic care costs. Sponsor and testifier statements emphasized the policy is funded by retiree premiums rather than general-fund dollars.
Ending: The committee took no final vote on the bill on April 1; Senate File 2668 was laid over for possible inclusion in future committee action.
