Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters ask Bothell to ease frontage requirements for small infill and adopt immigrant‑support resolution
Summary
Two public commenters urged the Bothell City Council to consider policy changes: one asked for flexibility on costly frontage improvements that can block small infill projects; another urged the council to adopt a resolution affirming support for immigrants and expand multilingual civic-education materials.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two members of the public spoke at the Oct. 7 Bothell City Council meeting about locally focused policy matters.
Justin Beaufort described his experience attempting a small infill project and said current frontage-improvement rules — specifically a new protected bike lane requirement for his street — would force him to replace existing sidewalk and street frontage at high cost, effectively scuttling a plan to build three townhomes behind his single-family home. "This would require us to destroy pretty much all the sidewalk at the front of my home and redo it to add the raised bike lane," Beaufort said, adding his builder had told him the frontage cost would make the project infeasible.
Beaufort requested that the city allow deviations for small infill projects when frontage improvements would make modest projects financially infeasible. He noted the public‑works director "may grant a deviation on reduced improvements based on transportation system" standards and asked staff to consider narrower or context‑sensitive application of frontage rules for small infill lots.
Prasad Angluri asked the council to consider and adopt a resolution affirming Bothell's support for immigrants and recommending steps the city could take, such as partnering with Northshore School District and community organizations to provide "know your rights" civic education and multilingual materials in schools and community centers. He said he had shared a draft resolution with staff and urged the council to adopt it with minor revisions.
Council staff noted they had received the written comments and that staff would follow up on items requiring additional work; no formal council action was taken on either public comment during the meeting.

