Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Addresses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kanosh council asks planning, county to help correct widespread street-address errors
Summary
Council members discussed yearslong local problems with incorrect house numbers and parcel addressing, asked planning and zoning to work with county GIS and volunteers to survey and propose corrected addresses for residents and emergency services.
Kanosh Town Council discussed a months‑long effort to correct inaccurate street addresses that residents say is causing delivery errors and delaying emergency response.
Council members and public commenters described dozens of homes whose posted house numbers and official records do not match their actual locations. Resident comments and the council’s discussion made clear the problem affects FedEx/UPS deliveries, some rural contractor deliveries, and emergency responders who rely on address data.
The council asked the planning and zoning commission to participate. Planning commissioner Stan (surname not specified) and staff member Lauren (surname not specified) said county GIS could be used to verify measurements; Adam Britt of county GIS offered to print updated aerial maps for the town. Planning and zoning representatives said they would review and, if willing, bring a volunteer plan to the council at a forthcoming work meeting. Council members and residents warned that some property owners will resist address changes because of the administrative burden of updating bank records, mail, and other accounts.
Council members discussed measurement options — measuring from road centerlines in fixed increments (standard 5‑ or 10‑foot increments were raised), using even/odd conventions, and whether to use fives or tens for numbering. Staff suggested surveying from paved centerlines and said the county’s data feeds into Google Maps and other commercial map services once corrected.
The town did not adopt a final plan at the meeting but directed planning and zoning to bring a work plan to the next meeting; commissioners said they would place the item on the planning commission’s agenda and report back. Residents who raised the issue said they will volunteer to help field‑verify numbers and that some property owners already had informal signs or painted numbers to make deliveries easier.
The council said any formal changes will be coordinated with Miller County (for official address changes), and that decisions about enforcement, who pays for new house number signs, and a potential phased approach will be discussed at subsequent meetings.
