Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bluff council begins rewrite of animal ordinance focused on dogs and cats; licensing and enforcement debated
Summary
Councilors reviewed a draft animal ordinance limited to dogs and cats, debated licensure and enforcement roles for county deputies, and asked staff to pare scope and circulate suggested edits before further action.
Bluff Town Councilors on March 11 reviewed a draft animal ordinance focused on dogs and cats and directed staff to collect edits and clarify enforcement logistics with San Juan County deputies before returning with a narrower draft for council consideration.
Town staff told the council the draft narrows Planning & Zoning—s earlier, broader animal ordinance to address dogs and cats only and to provide a path for deputies to respond to animals at large. The draft includes proposed licensing provisions: lifetime licenses for spayed/neutered animals and annual licenses for unaltered animals, with fees intended to cover administrative costs and tags.
Council members raised several concerns. Some members urged a short, clear standard to make enforcement practical (for example, a simple —dog at large— rule that allows deputies to pick up animals repeatedly found off their owners— property). Others cautioned that definitions such as a dog with a —propensity to be dangerous— are subjective and would need precise legal definitions before the town grants an animal-control officer authority that could lead to euthanasia.
Deputy Freestone (referred to in council remarks) and other county enforcement practices were discussed: councilors and staff said the county can issue tags and operate a licensure system and that the town would need to coordinate an interlocal agreement if it wants the county to handle licensing for Bluff residents. Staff suggested the town could require owner licensure with the county rather than build an in-house program if the county agreed to provide that service.
Councilors also debated equity and access concerns: one member noted surgical spay/neuter capacity is limited locally and cautioned that fees for unaltered animals might disproportionately affect households without access to low-cost veterinary clinics. A participant suggested outreach to animal-welfare organizations to arrange periodic clinics to increase access to sterilization services before the council finalizes any fee schedule.
No ordinance was adopted March 11. Councilors asked staff to pare complexity, run suggested redlines in the shared draft mode, coordinate with county deputies on enforcement logistics and impound procedures, and return with a revised draft for future action.
