Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wastewater Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gardiner wastewater Phase 2 project revised upward after roof and boiler cost increases; city pursuing multiple funding sources
Summary
The city’s wastewater superintendent reported a roughly $413,000 cost increase to the Phase 2 wastewater project to the Gardiner City Council, driven by roof replacements and boiler work; staff plan to seek USDA funding and may reapply for congressionally directed spending if available.
Get email alerts on the Wastewater Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Steve Abiola, the city’s wastewater superintendent, told the Gardiner City Council on March 19 that changes to the Phase 2 wastewater project — primarily roof replacements and increased boiler costs — have raised the project estimate and that the city is reviewing funding options.
Abiola said staff removed a planned sewer camera purchase from Phase 2 and moved it to the wastewater operating budget to reduce capital requests. With the added roof work and higher boiler prices, he said the project is currently showing roughly a $413,000 increase from previous estimates.
Why it matters: The council previously approved a $2.9 million scope for Phase 2; Abiola said staff will return seeking authorization to move forward with a higher figure (he cited an increase toward $3.3 million). He said the city is working with its engineering firm on final USDA grant or loan application materials and is exploring congressionally directed spending opportunities, but cautioned the federal funding rounds are likely to be more competitive.
Details and next steps: Abiola said parts of the existing plant roofing need full replacement and that boiler replacements are costlier than initially estimated. He discussed the timing and status of prior congressional application rounds and noted the city may reapply; staff will return to council with a formal request for increased project authorization and funding plan.
Ending: Council asked staff to continue refining cost estimates and funding applications; no bond or contract authorization was approved at the March 19 meeting.
