Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Public Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meadow council completes annual Open and Public Meetings Act review; quorum, notice, and closed-meeting rules explained
Summary
The mayor led the council through the town’s annual Open and Public Meetings Act review, covering quorum, meeting notice, minutes, closed-meeting rules, recording requirements and options for electronic participation.
The mayor led Meadow’s annual Open and Public Meetings Act training at the start of the meeting, reviewing when meetings must be public, how to post notices and minutes, and the narrow circumstances allowing closed sessions.
“As mayor, it’s my responsibility to make sure this happens,” the mayor said, introducing the training and saying the town will post that it has completed the annual requirement. He described a meeting as “the convening of a public body with a quorum present,” and said a quorum for the town is three members.
The mayor explained key points of the Open and Public Meetings Act: agendas, dates, start times and locations must be posted at least 24 hours in advance at the town’s regular posting place (the post office) and on the Utah Public Notice website; pending minutes must be posted within 30 days; and when minutes are approved the town has three business days to post the final version.
He outlined closed-meeting procedures: a two-thirds vote of members present is required to convene a closed meeting; the body must state the reasons and record the vote by name when entering the closed session; and closed-session recordings must be complete, unedited and retained. He said permissible reasons include discussion of a person’s character or competence, pending or reasonably imminent litigation, deployment of security devices or investigative proceedings involving alleged criminal conduct.
The mayor also covered electronic meetings, saying the town could offer a virtual option but that any electronic access must be open and available to the public and that the town must post anchor locations and how to access the meeting when it lists the agenda.
The training covered decorum and enforcement: anyone who willfully disrupts a meeting may be removed and such removals are subject to appeal; alleged violations of the Open and Public Meetings Act can be pursued with the county attorney or the attorney general and may void decisions taken without proper notice.
Ending: The council reviewed the slides and discussion as the town’s annual compliance step; staff will record completion of the training in the town’s records.
