Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Lawmakers debate SJR 13 proposal to allow partisan judicial races

2841212 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

State Representative Robin Lundstrom presented Senate Joint Resolution 13, which would permit judges to run with party labels; law professor Josh Silverstein testified against the change, citing research linking partisan judicial elections to more partisan decisionmaking.

State Representative Robin Lundstrom, a sponsor of SJR 13, told the Senate State Agencies & Governmental Affairs Committee that the resolution would let judicial candidates run with party labels so “the voters [would] know exactly what they were voting for.”

The proposal drew a substantive, policy-focused response from Josh Silverstein, a law professor who testified in his individual capacity. Silverstein summarized the debate as a tradeoff between voter information and judicial behavior: “The signature argument in favor of partisan elections is it will provide more information to the voters,” he said. “The…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans