Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Preliminary FY 2025–26 budget projects modest surplus; council discusses sheriff staffing and possible joint letter to supervisors

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff presented a conservative preliminary general fund forecast for fiscal 2025–26 showing a small projected surplus; council debated refuse-rate timing and potential increases to contract costs for sheriff services and directed staff to prepare a draft letter supporting increased deputy recruitment and staffing.

City Finance staff presented a preliminary projection for the general fund for fiscal year 2025–26 showing modest growth in property taxes (staff used a conservative 4% projection) and overall a projected budgetary surplus of about $77,000 absent new capital proposals.

Major revenue drivers discussed included property tax growth, real property transfer tax tied to home sales, and building-permit revenues; staff noted building permits are volatile and the Finance/Audit/Budget committee recommended a conservative permit revenue estimate. Staff noted salary and benefit inflation (3.5% COLA and up to 1.5% merit for employees) and anticipated modest increases in contract costs for law enforcement (county sheriff) including a rise in liability premiums. On benefits, staff included a 2% increase in maximum employer contributions for health coverage consistent with labor agreements.

Council paused on a policy decision over refuse rates: staff was directed to mail Prop.218 notices to begin the public hearing process for a refuse-provider COLA (the contract is roughly $1 million, and a 5% increase would be on the order of $50,000). Council members debated whether the general fund should absorb any increase or pass it to ratepayers; the council directed staff to notice the hearing, with final decisions to come at the hearing.

During the budget presentation council members also discussed public-safety service levels provided under the county sheriff contract. City staff and council members attending a peninsula-wide city-manager meeting described sheriff recruitment and academy capacity challenges, and council members asked staff to work with neighboring Peninsula cities and the mayor pro tem on a joint letter to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors supporting Sheriff Luna’s recruitment initiatives and requests for county resources to fill deputy vacancies.

Why this matters: the budget outlook is stable but sensitive to building permit receipts, contract COLA requests and staffing levels for public safety; the council’s direction to notice refuse-rate adjustments begins a formal public process that could affect household bills later this year.