Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Forest Service Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Valley County officials, residents press Forest Service on roadless areas, NEPA and species rules
Summary
County commissioners and residents discussed submitting comments to the U.S. Forest Service on roadless-area management, the National Environmental Policy Act process, recent species-designation threats and grazing impacts, and agreed to collect draft comments for the commission to consider next week.
Valley County commissioners and residents on Monday discussed coordinating formal comments to the U.S. Forest Service about management of roadless areas, the National Environmental Policy Act process and recent species-designation remarks that residents said could restrict snowmobiling and grazing.
The discussion, prompted by a letter from the Farm Bureau and requests from commissioners, centered on whether the county should submit an official comment and how residents should file responses before the April 11 deadline. Larry, a local resident who spoke at the meeting, said a district ranger had warned that “if we don't stop snowmobile incursions in a certain area, he's gonna use the Wolverine to cut snowmobiling out,” language Larry characterized at the meeting as a threat tied to species protections.
County Commissioner Sherry said the Forest Service often reports actions after decisions are made rather than seeking local input. “They don't come in and say, 'here's what we're think we're doing. What do you think?'” she said, arguing the agency and the county should collaborate more often.
Why it matters: county officials and ranchers said Forest Service management decisions affect local access, grazing and wildfire risk. Speakers linked long NEPA timelines and litigation to delayed or split projects in the McCall–New Meadows district, noting work on earlier projects was broken into multiple new projects even after millions of dollars were spent on environmental review.
Discussion details: speakers asked the commission to address several topics in any formal comments, including: roadless-area management and what residents described as a lack of active treatment there; streamlining NEPA to reduce time and cost of environmental review; clarity from Forest Service staff about species designations and how they would be enforced; and the practical effects of grazing contracts (one speaker said some graziers treat the contracted grass as their own and that prescribed burns raise questions about reimbursement for lost forage).
Several speakers cited a long-standing “recommended wilderness” designation that they said has remained unchanged for decades and is not being reexamined as forest plans call for every five years. Speakers also referenced specific local projects—formerly a single “boulder” project later split into Grama Meadows, Granite Goose and Granite Slope—that, they said, consumed NEPA funds over multiple years without producing completed work.
Next steps and deadlines: participants noted an April 11 comment deadline. Larry urged residents to file individually and said he already submitted a comment; others favored a coordinated county letter. A county official said commissioners would collect suggested language and put a draft on next week’s agenda for potential county-level submission. One commissioner advised that individuals should not identify themselves as county commissioners if they submit personal comments, but that the commission could also submit a coordinated letter after formal approval.
No formal motion or vote was taken at the meeting. Instead, officials agreed to solicit input from commissioners and residents, compile suggested comments and return the draft to the commission for possible approval at the next meeting.
Background: speakers mentioned recent or proposed state-level bills from Utah and Montana asking for changes to federal or regional management approaches; those bills were described in general terms and not introduced as formal county positions. Participants also referenced previous administrative efforts to shorten NEPA timelines, saying deadlines imposed in a prior administration were later reversed. Speakers urged attention to insect-killed timber and overgrown stands that residents say have worsened fire risk and called for cooperative, periodic engagement between the Forest Service and the county.
Ending: commissioners and residents agreed to share suggested language by email; county staff will place a draft county comment on next week’s agenda for the commission to consider for submission to the Forest Service.
