Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Labor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves bill raising penalties for child-labor violations after floor debate; 117-85
Summary
The Pennsylvania House on March 24 approved House Bill 118 to increase statutory fines for child-labor law violations, after floor debate that split lawmakers along concerns about enforcement and effects on small employers. The measure passed on final passage, 117 yeas to 85 nays.
Get email alerts on the Child Labor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Pennsylvania House of Representatives on March 24 passed House Bill 118, which raises penalties for violations of the state's child labor law, by a final vote of 117 yeas to 85 nays.
Proponents said the bill strengthens deterrence against employers who exploit minors; opponents warned higher fines could discourage small businesses from hiring teenagers. Representative Marcia Young, the bill's sponsor, said the measure merely increases existing penalties and urged colleagues to protect young workers. "No child should have to worry about their rights being disregarded or disrespected," Young said on the floor.
The bill increases the monetary penalties that apply upon conviction. Under the language described on the House floor, first-offense fines rise from $500 to $1,000 and repeat-offender fines rise from $1,500 to $3,000. The clerk announced the final tally after members voted on final passage; the bill will be returned to the Senate for concurrence.
Lawmakers for and against the bill framed the debate differently. Representative Tom Topper, the House floor leader, said he worried the change "could lead to more employers choosing not to employ these young people," and stated on the record, "I will be a no on House Bill 118." Representative Jason Dawkins, majority chair of the Labor and Industry Committee, urged members to hold employers accountable: "Are we really going to stand in the way of holding business owners accountable when they are violating these laws?" he asked, and urged a yes vote.
Representative Grove, the minority chair of the Labor and Industry Committee, cited the record of prosecutions under the statute and urged caution. He told colleagues that enforcement actions under the statute have been infrequent: "They had 13 cases in the past 11 years," he said, and described how many were withdrawn or not disposed. Representative Jeff Heffley, minority chair of Human Services, and others argued the bill would impose additional burdens on small employers and could reduce entry-level opportunities for teenagers.
Representative Matt Miller (Allegheny County) framed the measure narrowly: "All it says ... is don't prey upon them when you're doing your business," he said, adding later, "That's it. That's all it is." Representative Samuelson, majority chair of Finance, and other supporters noted the bill does not change legal working ages, hour limits, or permit requirements, and characterized the change as a targeted increase in penalties to deter violations.
During the debate members were repeatedly admonished to stay on the scope of HB118. The House took the ayes and nays in accordance with the rules; the clerk recorded 117 yeas and 85 nays, which the chair announced met the constitutional majority. The clerk returned the bill to the Senate for concurrence.
Clarifying details discussed on the floor included the current and proposed fine amounts, that the bill does not change statutory working ages or hour limits, and that enforcement actions under the statute have been rare in recent years according to committee members' citations of court data.
The record of the vote will be sent to the Senate; no amendment to the substantive worker-protection provisions of the child labor law was adopted during the March 24 session.

