Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Incentives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee seeks clearer public timing and community-benefit framing for economic development agreements
Summary
Committee members asked staff for a clearer, more consistent format and timing when presenting economic development incentive requests; staff agreed to develop a framework that better articulates community benefits and recommended public discussion steps following executive sessions.
The Administrative Services Committee discussed on March 27 how the city presents economic development agreements and incentives to council and the public, with members requesting clearer timing and more explicit statements of community benefit.
Andy Hess, a staff member, said staff can improve how incentive requests are presented and that a more complete template or framework could be developed to show the community benefit and the tradeoffs of any incentive. "What people are looking for is: we're giving an incentive, but what's the community benefit?" Hess said.
Council members said a frequent complaint is a lack of public discussion time after executive sessions and before agreements appear on consent. Councilwoman Dylan Hedrick said going straight from executive session to placing an item on consent can deny the public and council opportunity for open discussion. "The timing as well... going straight from an executive session to a consent agenda item without time to be discussed openly by the public," Hedrick said.
Staff and council discussed distinguishing zoning deviation decisions (land-use, guided by the comprehensive plan and the GDC) from economic development incentives that can involve Chapter 380-type agreements. Staff said they generally use the city's economic development plan as a guideline but that some flexibility is necessary so staff can negotiate suitable packages for different situations.
Committee members asked staff to return with a proposed format and process that clarifies presentation timing (work-session briefing versus consent/individual item), articulates community benefits and explains how staff assesses return on investment and broader neighborhood impacts. Staff agreed to bring recommended ideas to a future meeting.
