Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Environment Committee advances bills on bear hunting, Sunday hunting, animal welfare and aquaculture; votes held open until 2 p.m.

2811730 · March 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a March 28 Environment Committee meeting, members advanced several bills to the floor — including measures on bear hunting, Sunday hunting on private land, animal-testing alternatives and aquaculture — after debate. Committee leaders said roll-call votes were recorded and votes will be held open until 2 p.m.

State Representative John Michael Parker, chair of the Environment Committee, convened the March 28 meeting and steered the committee through nine agenda items, moving several to the House floor with committee recommendation after debate and roll-call votes.

The committee’s most contested discussions centered on changes to bear-management law and a proposal to allow limited Sunday hunting on private land. Lawmakers also debated a bill that combines requirements to expand non-animal testing methods with biodiesel blending mandates and considered bills on feral-cat handling, pet-store animal welfare, aquaculture, and PFAS study and coordination.

Representative Mashinsky, who opposed the bear measure, warned the committee that the bill “is deciding to kill a bear based on their behavior the previous year” and urged greater use of nonlethal tools. Representative Horn, who represents many farmers, said crop losses can be rapid and argued the bill gives producers “more tools to address” severe, immediate damage to fields. Representative Mashinsky also questioned protections for hikers under the Sunday-hunting language, noting that some blazed trails cross private property.

Committee members said they will continue working on language changes before the bills go to the House for further action. Several lawmakers described agency and stakeholder concerns that will require follow-up — for example, the aquaculture bill’s treatment of oyster-shell recycling was pared back after a report raised storage and burden…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans