Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate amends and passes S.127 to expand tax-increment financing option for housing projects
Summary
The Senate amended S.127 to clarify the bill’s purpose as supporting workforce housing, extended evaluation/sunset timing for housing TIFs, and passed the bill on third reading; proponents said annual reports will allow legislative oversight.
The Vermont Senate on March 31 amended and passed S.127, an act relating to housing and housing development, after adopting changes intended to direct tax-increment financing (TIF) toward workforce and starter housing.
Senator from Washington led an amendment focused on section 16 of the bill, which concerns housing TIF districts. The amendment revised language to emphasize the bill’s purpose — subsidizing infrastructure costs to support workforce housing — and adjusted program timing and reporting requirements. The chamber adopted the amendment by voice vote and then passed the bill on third reading.
Senators and witnesses told the chamber that project financing and rising construction costs make many housing developments financially complex, often requiring a mix of subsidized affordable units, market-rate units and other products to make projects pencil. The amendment reflects that complexity by preserving flexibility for municipalities and developers while requiring annual reporting to the Legislature showing units proposed, units in construction and related outcomes.
Senators said the Vermont Economic Progress Council (VEPC) and the Vermont Housing Finance Agency provided input during drafting. The amendment extended the evaluation/sunset timing from an initial five-year window to a 10-year horizon so the Legislature would have sufficient data about whether the TIF approach led to the desired housing outcomes.
Senator Cummings, reporting on behalf of the Senate committee on economic development, housing and general affairs, said the committee supports the changes and expects annual reports to show whether TIF districts are producing the intended workforce housing. The chamber recorded no roll call on passage; the presiding officer announced the ayes had it and S.127 passed.
Ending: Supporters said the measure creates a more flexible TIF tool for smaller communities to subsidize infrastructure needed for workforce housing; opponents expressed concern that incentives could be used for higher-end development, but the annual reporting requirement was cited as a safeguard.
