Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Firearms Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly committee hears AB199 to increase penalties for illegal firearm discharges, expand juvenile review
Summary
Assemblyman Ruben Da Silva presented Assembly Bill 199 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee, proposing stiffer penalties for certain unlawful firearm discharges, changes to aiming/discharge statutes, and expanded mandatory juvenile risk assessments when juveniles are arrested for firearm possession.
Get email alerts on the Firearms Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assemblyman Ruben Da Silva introduced Assembly Bill 199 on behalf of sponsors and law-enforcement partners, saying the bill seeks to hold people accountable for negligent firearm discharges and to require earlier intervention when juveniles are found with guns. "AB 199 seeks to amend this by removing the malicious and wanton language, thereby focusing on the act of negligent discharge itself regardless of intent," Da Silva said.
The bill would (1) eliminate the intentional standard for some negligent-discharge offenses, (2) split and recodify aiming and discharge offenses, raising willful unlawful discharge in populated areas or places where people might be endangered to a Category C felony, and (3) expand juvenile-court risk-assessment requirements so that juveniles arrested for firearm possession in certain circumstances must be evaluated before release.
"The goal of this bill is to increase penalties for illegal firearm discharges and juvenile firearm possession," Detective Adrian Hunt of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department told the committee. Hunt presented local enforcement statistics and urged the committee to act. He said Metro was using gunshot-detection technology and community programs to reduce juvenile firearm access.
John Jones, representing the Nevada District Attorneys Association, walked committee members through the bill and an amendment negotiated with public defenders on several points. Jones said the new subsection would make willful, unlawful discharges that endanger people or occur in a designated populated area a category C felony and emphasized the bill is not intended to reach accidental or lawful self-defense discharges. "We are dealing with willful and unlawful discharges of firearms," Jones said.
Proponents, including Jason Walker of the Washoe County Sheriff’s Office and David Cherry for the city of Henderson, told the committee the changes would create clearer prosecutorial tools and increase accountability. Pastor Troy Martinez of Rebuilding Every City Around Peace testified in support, describing long experience with youth violence and urging action.
Opponents — including Paloma Guerrero of the Clark County Public Defender’s Office, Angela Knott of the Washoe County Public Defender’s Office, the ACLU of Nevada and the Nevada NAACP — said raising a negligent-discharge offense to felony status risks worsening racial disparities and expanding mass incarceration without evidence the change would reduce gun violence. Guerrero told the committee, "increasing the penalty up to a felony is a time and tried failed solution." Other witnesses urged investments in community-based violence-intervention, job-training and diversion programs instead of higher penalties.
Defense and public-safety witnesses also debated discretion and charging: prosecutors said charging and plea negotiation give prosecutors latitude to depart from the statutory maximums; public defenders warned that felony exposure increases the likelihood juveniles will be certified as adults.
Several members asked clarifying legal and practical questions: how the bill distinguishes accidental from willful discharges, how courts would prove the location boundaries for "populated areas" (county commissions designate those areas), and how juvenile risk assessments would operate. Brigid Duffy, Assistant District Attorney in Clark County, confirmed the bill would not change existing practice for firearms found on school grounds (those already require evaluations) but would expand mandatory assessments to certain community arrests and offenses involving pneumatic weapons in school settings.
Public comment on AB199 ran extensively, with callers both for and against the bill describing personal experience with gun violence. Law-enforcement presenters cited local data during their remarks (for example, Metro's posted figures on shots-fired incidents and juveniles involved in firearm incidents for 2024) and promoted prevention programs such as DREAM (Discover, Redirect, Empower, Advocate, Mentor).
The committee closed the hearing on AB199 after testimony and returned to its agenda; no final committee vote on AB199 was taken during the session recorded in the transcript.
Ending: The committee will carry the record of testimony and questions forward; sponsors and stakeholders indicated willingness to continue negotiating amendments after the hearing.

