Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Farmers urges Utah Supreme Court not to adopt Illinois rule on duty to defend
Summary
At oral argument, counsel for Farmers Insurance told the Utah Supreme Court that adopting the "Illinois rule" would be unnecessary on the case record and would force the court to decide issues that do not affect the parties’ rights, urging the court instead to treat the duty to defend as arising from contract.
At oral argument before the Utah Supreme Court, Troy Buer, counsel for Farmers Insurance Exchange, urged the justices not to adopt the so-called Illinois rule for insurer liability for failing to defend. “If the court does not adopt the Illinois rule ... there's no reason to reach the duty to defend issue,” Buer told the court, arguing that the case’s factual record would leave the duty-to-defend question unnecessary to resolve.
Buer told the court that the unique posture of the record — including a prior partial summary judgment that removed tort liability and a trial record that limited damages — meant the court could avoid deciding the duty-to-defend question if it declined to adopt Illinois’s approach. “If indemnification goes away and there's no responsibility for the judgment and no emotional distress…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

