Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Organ Donation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to ease in‑state organ procurement transport wins industry, funeral‑home support after edits
Summary
SB349 would permit approved organ procurement organizations to transport anatomical gifts within Nevada to donor care units under prescribed county procedures; stakeholders including funeral homes and coroners negotiated changes to the bill.
CARSON CITY — Senate Bill 349, which revises provisions governing anatomical gifts and organ procurement, drew support from hospitals, funeral homes and the Nevada Donor Network after sponsors and proponents negotiated language with coroners and mortuary stakeholders.
What the bill does: SB349 allows county coordinators to prescribe procedures permitting a procurement organization (example: Nevada Donor Network) to transport a deceased donor within the state to a donor care unit — an off‑site facility where staff can begin organ procurement when hospital operating rooms or other partners are unavailable. The amendment limits transport to situations requiring specialized medical equipment to preserve organ viability and requires coordination with coroners and morticians.
Why supporters back it: Witnesses said the change would reduce delays in organ procurement that make organs nonviable. Nevada Donor Network and supporters said a donor care unit would provide an operating room outside hospitals when OR availability is limited, helping maintain tight viability windows for organs.
Stakeholder concerns and fixes
- Funeral directors and mortuary representatives said they needed protections and clarity; the sponsor and proponents adjusted language to require county coroner procedures and to limit transport to medically necessary cases. Several funeral‑home representatives testified they supported the amended language.
- County counsel and coroners expressed neutrality while noting the coroner’s role in investigations and that regulations should not require coroners to establish procurement rules beyond their scope; they offered to continue technical drafting work with the sponsor.
Operational questions raised
- Senators questioned logistics: whether the transported decedent would be intact or moved in part, licensing and training for personnel operating ventilators during transport, liability, regulatory oversight, and whether the OPO would be a federally designated organ procurement organization subject to CMS oversight.
- Proponents said OPOs must meet federal CMS standards and that the transport staff would be trained; proponents agreed to provide more detailed operational and safety information to the committee.
Status: Committee hearing closed after support testimony; senators indicated remaining technical work between sponsors, county officials, funeral directors and coroners to refine language. No committee action was recorded in the hearing transcript.
Provenance
- Topic intro evidence: block_315 ("I will open the bill hearing on Senate Bill 3 49. This bill revises provisions relating to anatomical gifts.") - Topic finish evidence: block_413 (closing remarks and transition to next bill)
