Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oakley council approves Oakley 1886 subdivision final plat, including deed-restricted affordable unit
Summary
The Oakley City Council approved the final plat for the Oakley 1886 subdivision after a public hearing and brief discussion. The 12-lot development includes a deed-restricted affordable unit on Lot 13, private road access, protections for wetlands and trees, and transfer of water rights to the city.
The Oakley City Council voted to approve the final plat for the Oakley 1886 subdivision following a public hearing and staff presentation.
City planning staff described the proposal as a 12-lot subdivision created from four parcels spanning areas in two zoning designations (A-5 and A-40). The council was told the project includes an existing home designated as the affordable unit for compliance with the city’s affordable-housing requirement; that home (on Lot 13) will be deed restricted in perpetuity as affordable housing. A secondary dwelling (ADU) on Lot 13 could be allowed at market rate because the lot is not being subdivided further, staff said.
The planner explained project infrastructure and restrictions: the subdivision will connect to Oakley City culinary water via an 8-inch line with hydrants, be served by a pressurized secondary irrigation system, and use septic systems for wastewater. Water rights associated with the development will be deeded to the city in amounts appropriate to each lot’s acreage. A private 50-foot easement for access and utilities will provide ingress; the paved travel-way was described initially as 26 feet but staff and the applicant discussed reducing pavement to 24 feet to reduce impervious surface. An emergency/secondary access easement and public utility easements are shown on the plat.
The development agreement will specify building envelopes for primary and accessory dwellings, allow agricultural structures outside those envelopes, govern fencing (with limited grandfathering of existing concrete perimeter fencing), and incorporate the recorded Weber River Corridor Trail easement and related access provisions. Staff noted wetlands and sensitive-land overlays on parts of the property and said soils and bio-testing were provided to the city; buyers were cautioned those overlays carry development limitations enforced at the building-permit stage. A conditional-use allowance for a training/ropes course was described as permitted until issuance of the first building permit, at which point the conditional use would terminate and remaining building rights would be extinguished.
Developer representative Josh Paul addressed water-rights distribution and site access and praised the city’s review process: “Wow. We’re extremely appreciative of the ability to work with Oakley City,” Paul said. He confirmed the developer intends to allocate water shares to individual lots and that the applicant is open to reducing the paved road width.
The planning commission had reviewed the subdivision in two hearings and recommended approval. During the council meeting a council member disclosed a family relationship to an employee of a firm with involvement in the project; after that disclosure the member abstained from the vote. The final plat motion was moved and seconded and the council approved the plat with recorded aye votes and the stated abstention.
Documents referenced at the hearing include the development agreement, recorded trail easement documents, CC&Rs for the proposed association, soil and wetland delineation reports, and review comments from the fire marshal and city engineering.
Votes at a glance: Motion to approve final plat for the Oakley 1886 subdivision — moved/seconded on the record; outcome: approved (recorded aye votes; one abstention after disclosure).
