Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Souderton Area SD committee backs rename, expansion of high school 'Foundations' course to 'Finite Math'
Summary
Souderton Area School District Education Personnel Committee on March 19 reviewed a proposal to replace the high school course "Foundations of Algebra" with a new "Finite Math" course that adds trigonometry, probability and statistics, and financial literacy and is intended to remedy college-credit eligibility problems flagged by the NCAA Eligibility Center.
Get email alerts on the K 12 Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Souderton Area School DistrictEducation Personnel Committee members on March 19 reviewed a proposed curriculum revision to rename and expand the high school course previously offered as "Foundations of Algebra." Presenters said the change, to be titled "Finite Math," is intended to clarify college-credit eligibility for student-athletes and broaden the coursecontent with applied topics.
The course aims to bridge algebra II and college algebra while adding units on right-triangle trigonometry, probability and statistics, and financial literacy such as debt, compound interest and savings. "One of the units that this course focuses on is an opportunity to teach probability and statistics and introduce them to how to make better data-driven decisions," said Brad Garrett, presenting from the high school. Garrett said the course emphasizes real-world applications so students "see some of the connections to the things they're gonna see and experience in the next few years of their lives."
Committee members and the presenter said the change was prompted after the NCAA Eligibility Center (the clearinghouse) flagged the earlier course, apparently because of its title and a small number of exam items that suggested remedial content. "When we realized that students who deserve the credit might be declined credit at college, we set out to fix the problem," Garrett said. He and district staff described the revision as a departmental effort that also involved a staff member who pulled resources from multiple places to assemble the new curriculum.
Why this matters: District staff said the Foundations title had led to inconsistent treatment of Souderton students' transcripts by colleges for athletic eligibility, which could deny earned credit; the revised course seeks to reduce that risk and to support students headed to community colleges or four-year programs. The presenter told the committee he hoped to see improved SAT and ACT placement and better college-course placement for graduates.
Details and implementation: District staff said the course would preserve enrollment continuity (students in Foundations would follow into Finite Math) and that the department expects immediate implementation pending approval, with classes scheduled to begin in August. Garrett gave enrollment figures: "probably about 55 to 60 on average" in recent years, currently "3 sections" with roughly "72 signed up for it." He said word of the change had increased student interest.
Accessibility and scope: During public comment a community member asked whether the course would be suitable for students with individualized education programs; staff replied it would be available to any student eligible for elective classes and that students with IEPs would receive the same supports they would get in other classes.
Committee decision and next steps: Committee members voiced support for the change during the meeting and the presenter said the administration was prepared to implement the course pending formal approvals. The committee indicated it was "good with that" and staff said the course would be offered in August if approved. Formal district board approval is required before the change takes effect.
Ending: District staff said the Finite Math curriculum is intended both to address the NCAA concern and to better prepare students for college and personal finance. The committee discussion did not record a roll-call vote on this item; presenters asked for and received committee assent to move forward to formal approval stages.
