Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts multidisciplinary police staffing policy after heated debate, 6-5
Summary
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors narrowly approved a resolution directing a new, multidisciplinary process for reviewing police staffing levels after hours of debate over whether to mandate a specific officer target. The measure passed 6-5 and will be sent to the Public Safety Committee for further work.
San Francisco — The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday adopted a resolution directing a multidisciplinary process to review and recommend police staffing levels for the city, approving the measure as amended on a 6-5 vote.
The resolution, led by Supervisor Mark Farrell and debated at length, does not immediately raise the charter minimum but directs the Budget and Legislative Analyst and other city entities to study best practices for setting police staffing and to involve community stakeholders in that process. Supervisor Scott Wiener said the city needs a modern staffing goal to reflect population growth and peer-city comparisons; Wiener proposed a target of roughly 2,200 officers based on several analyses and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) recommendations.
Supporters argued the city has grown and gained new neighborhoods, and that SFPD has fewer officers than needed to maintain neighborhood patrols, traffic enforcement and property-crime response. "If you increase 1971 by our 13% population growth, you exceed 2,200," Wiener said during his remarks.
Opponents — including Supervisors Jane Kim, Katy Tang and John Avalos — said the resolution was premature and risked narrowing discussion to a single numeric target instead of a broader evaluation of resources, deployment, civilianization and alternatives to policing. Supervisor Kim highlighted studies and national guidance arguing that simple per-capita ratios are an inappropriate sole basis for staffing decisions and urged that training, deployment models and prevention investments be considered.
Deputy Chief Ali of the San Francisco Police Department answered questions during the hearing about implementation and training capacity; members raised concerns about whether the department has fully implemented PERF's recommended professional-development systems.
After several proposed amendments and votes over the meeting, the board adopted a final version of the resolution that emphasizes a multidisciplinary review rather than a single mandated increase. The roll call produced six votes in favor and five opposed. The board will refer the matter to the Public Safety Committee and the Budget and Legislative Analyst for further study and stakeholder engagement.
Why it matters: The resolution sets a process to reassess how the city determines police staffing levels, a decision that will affect budgeting, patrol coverage and the balance between law enforcement and social-service investments. Supporters view it as necessary to respond to population growth and property-crime concerns; critics warned that adopting a fixed target without multiagency review could divert money from prevention programs and other public-safety strategies.
Next steps: The board directed staff to produce a report on comparative staffing models, deployment strategies and civilianization options and to bring stakeholder input to the Public Safety Committee.
