Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Special Ed topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers weigh temporary path for school speech aids as state develops assistant licensure
Summary
HB 744 would allow school‑employed, unlicensed speech aids to perform limited, supervised repetitive tasks while the speech pathologist board and Department of Labor finalize rules for formal assistant licensure; supporters said it addresses rural shortages, opponents warned about training, supervision and consumer protection.
Get email alerts on the Education Special Ed topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Melissa Nikolakakos presented House Bill 744 to allow schools to hire unlicensed "speech aids" to perform limited, supervised tasks (for example repetitive drills) under the direction of a licensed speech language pathologist while the Board of Speech Pathology and Department of Labor finalize permanent rules for assistant licensure.
Lance Melton of the Montana School Boards Association and multiple school‑based speech pathologists testified the temporary allowance would help rural districts address severe shortages that leave pathologists stretched across many schools. Amy Raines and Michelle Herrington described supervising and training aids in remote communities and said aids historically enabled service delivery where certified personnel were unavailable.
Opponents, including the Montana Speech Language and Hearing Association (MASHA) and numerous licensed speech pathologists, objected to reinstating an unlicensed aid category. They argued training and oversight vary, that time‑intensive supervision would increase licensed clinicians' workloads, and that inadequate training risks reinforcing errors in therapy and undermines Medicaid billing rules and consumer protections. Witnesses provided examples and cited federal and state education laws requiring qualified personnel for special education services.
Committee members and the Department of Labor and Industry discussed regulatory options. DLI expressed concerns about rule‑making authority and funding for rule development; MASHA urged using Office of Public Instruction or para‑pathways training programs rather than licensing an untrained category in Title 37. Several senators requested background materials about prior aid categories and the rules that existed before 2021.
The sponsor and proponents said the bill contains a termination trigger so the temporary provision ends once the board and DLI promulgate rules and the aim is to restore practical service delivery while long‑term assistant pathways stand up.
