Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Long Term Care Family Councils topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee adopts amendments to create family council rights for memory-care residents
Summary
The Senate Human Services Committee on March 27 adopted dash-3 amendments to Senate Bill 228 and forwarded the measure to the Senate floor, clearing a proposal that would establish a resident'and-family right to form independent family councils in memory-care facilities and require facilities to respect those councils.
The Senate Human Services Committee on March 27 adopted amendments and sent Senate Bill 228 to the Senate floor with a due-pass recommendation, advancing a measure that would give residents of memory-care facilities the explicit right to form independent family councils and set facility obligations when councils form.
The bill, as explained by staff member Matt during the committee'work session, "establishes the right of a resident in a residential care facility to the formation of a family council. It establishes requirements for facilities if a family council was formed and allows the Department of Human Services to impose certain civil penalties." The committee adopted the dash-3 amendment, which Matt summarized as replacing the introduced text and clarifying that the right applies to residents in memory-care facilities and that facilities may not interfere with a council's formation.
The measure drew bipartisan procedural support in committee. Senator Lytham moved to adopt the dash-3 amendments; the roll call recorded "Aye" votes from members including Senator Nash, Senator Frasanski, Senator Reynolds, Vice Chair Lythagam and Chair Gelser Blue, after which Chair Gelser Blue declared the motion passed and the dash-3 amendments adopted. Senator Lythagam and Jerrick Elserbleau then moved the bill, as amended, to the floor with a due-pass recommendation. A subsequent roll call recorded additional "Aye" votes and the chair announced the bill was on its way to the floor. The committee noted that Senator Manning will carry the bill on the floor.
Supporters and staff said the dash-3 amendment produced no revenue impact and only a minimal fiscal impact. Committee members acknowledged stakeholders'including families, the Oregon Health Care Association and SEIU'had worked together to refine the language. Chair Gelser Blue said she received communication from the Oregon Health Care Association indicating the organization was satisfied with the dash-3 amendments.
No formal dissent or substantive debate about the bill's policy goals was recorded in committee; discussion focused on technical refinements and process. Committee members also noted two other bills on the agenda that were carried over to a later date because paperwork was not yet ready.
If enacted as amended, the bill would require facilities to respect family councils formed by residents or their families, prohibit facility interference with council formation, and authorize the Oregon Department of Human Services to pursue civil penalties where the law applies. Specific penalty amounts or enforcement procedures were not detailed in committee testimony beyond the staff summary that fiscal impacts would be minimal.
The committee proceeded to other items after adopting the amendment and moving the bill to the floor; no public hearing on SB 228 was recorded in this transcript segment.
