Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Remote Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to allow remote attendance for school board members discussed; sponsor will seek further drafting
Summary
House Bill 83 would let school board members attend meetings remotely for limited reasons such as health or military deployment and count toward quorum. Committee members raised concerns about scope, pregnancy/postpartum language and local control; the sponsor committed to draft amendments and to seek signatures to move the bill forward.
Get email alerts on the Board Remote Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Wilson Anton presented House Bill 83, which would ‘‘require school boards to allow members to attend school board meetings via remote method under certain limited circumstances related to health or military deployments,’’ she told the committee. The bill would treat a member who participates electronically under enumerated circumstances as present for quorum and votes.
Committee members asked whether the bill should mirror legislative rules and whether allowances would be too broad. Representative Mike Smith noted the bill differed from House rules and asked about consistency. Representative Chukwuocha and others asked whether pregnancy and postpartum caregiving by a partner would qualify; the sponsor called House Attorney Karen Lance to clarify. Lance said pregnancy itself would not be considered an illness, but complications that required caregiving could be covered.
Members expressed concern that the bill creates a statewide floor rather than preserving local control. House Attorney Lance said the bill creates a floor that local boards could add to but could not limit below the statute. Representative Anton said her intent was to provide a floor but to respect local procedures and committed to drafting language to tighten the bill and to ensure a clearer floor/ceiling balance.
The committee did not complete a roll-call vote on HB 83 during the hearing; the sponsor indicated she would be ‘‘walking the bill for signatures to be released’’ and noted at one point the committee was one vote short. Several members said they wanted language tightened before final committee action.
Why it matters: HB 83 would formalize circumstances under which school board members may attend remotely and count toward quorum, but committee members raised concerns about potential abuse and the balance between a state minimum and local control.
What’s next: The sponsor committed to work with staff on drafting amendments to clarify limits (including pregnancy/postpartum language) and to return with revised language and signatures for committee release.
