Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Active Transportation Transit Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advocates press Legislature to restore $400 million cut to Active Transportation Program as transit agencies warn of 'fiscal cliff'
Summary
During public comment at the March 1, 2025 Assembly Transportation hearing, transportation advocates and transit officials urged restoration of a $400 million cut to the Active Transportation Program and sought additional state support to avert operating crises at transit agencies.
Get email alerts on the Active Transportation Transit Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During public comment at the March 1, 2025 hearing, multiple transportation advocacy groups and transit representatives urged the Legislature to restore a $400 million cut made last year to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) and to address emerging operating shortfalls across transit agencies.
"We urge you to find a solution to last year's cut of $400,000,000 to the ATP," Jeanne Wardwaller of Greenlining and Transform told the committee, emphasizing ATP's role in funding projects that benefit disadvantaged communities. Laura Tolkoff of Spur described deep fiscal pressures facing major Bay Area operators, saying the region's four largest operators face operating deficits equal to "25 to 40% of their budgets," which she called "existential shortfalls."
Kendra Ramsey of the California Bicycle Coalition and Sophie Abaco of the Coalition for Clean Air also urged restoring ATP funding, citing safety, air quality and access for people without cars. "The active transportation program helps clean our air and make it more affordable to travel by building biking and walking infrastructure," Abaco said.
Michael Pimdall of the California Transit Association asked the Legislature to advance $1 billion in the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program and to consider additional resources to stabilize operations while longer‑term revenue solutions are developed. Advocates suggested examining the State Highway Account and flexible federal funds before turning to GGRF or other restricted resources.
Ending: Advocates urged immediate attention to ATP and transit operating stability during the budget cycle. The committee heard the appeals but did not take action at the informational hearing; lawmakers signaled they will consider these priorities as part of wider budget deliberations.
