Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council receives report on short‑term vacation rentals; majority declines to expand rules to residential areas
Summary
City staff presented options on short‑term vacation rentals (STVRs), including allowing owner‑occupied room rentals in primary residences. After public comment and debate, the council voted 4–1 to receive the informational report and make no immediate law changes; Council Member Keegan voted no.
The Hermosa Beach City Council received an informational presentation on the city’s short‑term vacation rental (STVR) regulations and took no immediate legislative action.
What staff presented Planning staff reviewed Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 17.42.182.180, which prohibits STVRs in residential zones while allowing regulated STVR use in certain nonconforming residential units within specified commercial zones. Staff reported approximately 45 properties in eligible commercial zones, with 10 active licenses covering roughly 20 STVR listings as of the report. The presentation identified enforcement challenges, noted that some other jurisdictions permit owner‑occupied room rentals in a primary residence, and flagged that the state housing agency (HCD) has had an interest in local STVR regulations.
Public comment and council response Union representatives and hotel‑sector workers urged limits on unhosted whole‑home rentals and asked for stronger enforcement tools (electronic verification, private right of action). Several residents favored keeping residential zones protected from STVRs and opposed expanding rights citywide. Council members discussed whether to pilot owner‑occupied room rentals in limited areas, and Council Member Keegan said he would oppose creating broader owner‑occupied allowances citywide.
Council action Council Member DeToy moved to receive and file the report; the motion carried 4–1 with Council Member Keegan voting no. Council discussion included directing staff to consult HCD on potential changes if the council pursues them in the future and to return with implementation and enforcement options if directed in a later session.
Why it matters STVR policy intersects housing supply, neighborhood character, revenue collection (transient occupancy tax) and enforcement capacity. Council members said the issue requires balancing visitor demand and resident housing needs, and several asked staff to consider enforcement mechanisms before any code changes.
Next steps No code change was adopted. Staff will proceed as directed (receive and file) and will bring back specific legislative proposals only if council gives further direction in a future agenda.
Recorded action - Motion to receive and file the STVR informational report: moved by Council Member DeToy; seconded; vote 4–1 (Council Member Keegan voting no).
