Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Citizens Forum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speakers urge local food resilience and allege law-enforcement retaliation during Citizens Forum
Summary
During Citizens Forum, a resident urged city support for backyard flocks and local food resilience; another speaker accused local law enforcement and the district attorney's office of retaliatory actions and said she had not received official dismissal documentation for charges she says were dropped.
Get email alerts on the Citizens Forum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the March 20 meeting’s Citizens Forum, two speakers addressed the commission on separate community concerns: one advocated expanding support for backyard flocks and local egg production, and another described alleged misconduct by local law enforcement and the district attorney’s office, asking the commission to investigate and to help obtain official dismissal documents.
Why it matters: Both speakers raised policy- and trust-related questions. The backyard-flock suggestion touches on municipal regulation of domestic animals and local food security; the allegation of law-enforcement retaliation alleges possible misconduct that could merit follow-up by the city or county officials.
Resident Norm Odeon (address provided) told the commission he sells eggs at market and urged the city to consider small-scale programs that could improve local food security. He cited examples from overseas and suggested the city explore programs to distribute chicks to families as a public investment to improve nutrition, reduce waste and increase resiliency in local food supply chains.
Citizen Shayla Larson described a personal account of being arrested on obstruction-related charges in August 2024, later having those charges escalated and then dismissed. Larson said the dismissal occurred in late February 2025 but that the district attorney’s office had not provided the dismissal paperwork to her or her attorney. She alleged ongoing surveillance, harassment and retaliation tied to prior advocacy and asked the commission to investigate and ensure she receive the dismissal documentation. Larson asked for immediate answers and accountability.
Commissioners asked whether staff had contact information for Larson and indicated that staff would follow up; one commissioner asked staff to gather contact details so appropriate officials could follow up. No formal action was taken on either speaker’s requests during the meeting.
What commissioners said: The chair asked whether staff had contact information for Larson so the commission could follow up; staff requested her phone number and said they would pursue follow-up outside the meeting. On the backyard-flock topic, commissioners and attendees noted concerns about predators and the local limits on flock size, and one speaker in the audience said they would be willing to host additional birds to help a neighbor.
Outcome: The commission received the comments. Staff committed to follow up on the request for dismissal documentation and to gather contact information for the speaker who raised alleged law-enforcement misconduct. No formal investigation or action was announced at the meeting.

