Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee unanimously recommends Benchmark Advance as K–5 ELA curriculum, plans phased rollout and nine days of professional development
Summary
An elementary committee recommended Benchmark Advance as the district's K'5 English language arts curriculum after visiting districts and evaluating materials for alignment with the science of reading. The committee cited explicit phonics, writing instruction and scaffolded small-group time; the board will consider the recommendation April 8.
A Niskayuna Central School District elementary curriculum committee told the Board of Education on March 25, 2025 that it unanimously recommends Benchmark Advance as the district's K'5 English language arts curriculum and asked the board to approve a phased implementation beginning next school year.
The committee said its review prioritized alignment with the science of reading; equity and cultural responsiveness; explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonics; strong writing instruction; and supports for multilingual learners and students with disabilities. The committee reported 22 regular participants, school-level representation from each elementary building, and visits to other districts using candidate programs before making the selection.
Megan Collins, identified in the meeting as the district's reading and library-media director and a leader of the review team, described the local context: the district had adopted Heggerty (phonemic awareness) and the Foundations product for K'2 in prior years and moved Foundations into grade 3 this year. Collins said the committee sought a more integrated K'5 program that sequences explicit, spiraled instruction and connects reading, writing, speaking and listening across thematic units.
Committee member Kellen McCluskey, a fifth-grade teacher on the review team, described the recommended program's structure: a 90-minute daily literacy block divided into three 30-minute segments. The whole-group tier—one instruction would occupy 30 minutes; the program reserves a second 30-minute block for differentiated "what I need" instruction (intervention, enrichment or review) and includes dedicated writing instruction tied to reading content. McCluskey said the program is 50 percent fiction and 50 percent nonfiction and includes a clearly defined scope-and-sequence to support transfer of skills.
On supports: the committee said the program includes embedded screening and mini-assessments and that the district's existing i-Ready diagnostic (already piloted for reading) will continue to provide another data point. Presenters said the program supports students with dyslexia or other reading complications and that the Wilson program would remain available for intensive, specialist services when required.
Professional development and implementation: the district told the board it plans nine professional-development days in the first year and coaching and virtual PD options. The presenters recommended focusing initial implementation on whole-group Tier 1 instruction in year one and increasing small-group expertise in year two to reduce burden on teachers during rollout.
Questions from board members covered differentiation for twice-exceptional students, transition to middle school scheduling, and how the program supports students reading above grade level. Presenters said differentiation occurs primarily in the daily "what I need" block and that enrichment, book clubs and MTSS (multi-tiered system of supports) strategies will address higher-performing students.
The district will bring the formal adoption recommendation to the board at its April 8 meeting; no vote was taken on March 25.
Attribution and sources: Quotes and program details in this article derive from the March 25 district presentation and committee remarks.
