Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves series of tax-roll corrections, training and vendor purchase orders including CIC and Comtech items
Summary
Osage County commissioners approved tax-roll corrections and multiple purchase orders March 25: CIC tax administration training and abstracts (several POs totaling $85,400 across items described in meeting), a $3,548 Comtech PO for appraisal notices, and other departmental payroll/hiring approvals.
The Osage County Commission approved a set of fiscal and purchasing items on March 25, including tax-roll corrections and purchase orders for tax-administration services, abstracts and appraisal notices.
The commission approved tax-roll corrections as presented by the county appraiser's office. Following that, commissioners approved purchase orders for tax-administration training and November abstracts from CIC Tax Administration Solutions: the commission amended an initial amount to approve a $7,000 purchase order (PO 3984) for tax-administration training and other services to be paid from the ClerkTech fund and split $467 each among three departmental funds for a $1,400 purchase order (PO 4065) for combo training. Commissioners also approved a $77,000 purchase order (PO 4064) for November abstracts to be paid from the clerk's fund; the clerk and appraiser confirmed fund splits and allocations on the record.
In addition, the commission approved purchase order 4016 in the amount of $3,548 to Comtech System Corp for 2025 personal-property notice-of-value work, to be paid from the appraiser’s contractual account (134-00-5200). Commission minutes record these motions passing on voice votes.
The meeting also included personnel items; the commission approved payroll status reports and a retention bonus/hiring package presented by Sheriff Wells, including movement of an employee into the jail with shift differentials accounted for and retention-bonus funding referenced to sheriff department funds. Commissioners requested clerical clarification on fund splits and confirmed amounts before voting.
No substantial debate preceded the approvals; commissioners handled each item individually with motions, seconds and voice votes recorded as “Aye.” The records presented at the meeting list PO numbers and amounts for each item.
