Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Education School Schedule Academies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents, students and teachers urge pause on Mountain View block schedule and academy rollout
Summary
Multiple parents, students and teachers used the board's public-comment period to urge the Mesa Public Schools Governing Board to delay or halt a planned block schedule and academy/CTE changes at Mountain View High School, saying implementation lacks parent input, clear data and adequate teacher support.
Get email alerts on the K 12 Education School Schedule Academies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dozens of parents, students and staff addressed the Mesa Public Schools Governing Board during public comment to press the district to delay implementation of a block schedule and college-and-career academy changes at Mountain View High School.
Student speaker Lily Astell said the block schedule experience at Mountain View had harmed classroom learning, calling it "a disaster" and saying, "We really struggled to focus in class." Several parents echoed that concern and said they learned of the proposed changes only after they were already being piloted.
Parents asked the board to require clearer, data-driven justification before rolling the program out more widely. Gretchen Astell, who said she has four children in the district, asked the board to "consider delaying the rollout at Mountain View until Mountain View can show that teacher and parents have been involved in the changes, and that the changes are data driven." Anna Eager said she first heard about the academy pathway program when a meeting notice appeared on social media and asked the district to make any report it had prepared public.
Several current and former Mountain View teachers and staff who spoke said classroom workload and morale are strained. Meg Howell, a 42-year educator who said she is retiring this year, described teachers as "afraid to speak out" and said the changes were making it harder to keep experienced staff. Bonnie Drain, a long-time volunteer and substitute teacher, said many of the district's pilot models had failed to deliver the promised classroom benefits and that only "50% of the 8 FAST teams" at Mountain View this year had been successful.
Parents also raised operational concerns tied to the proposed schedule changes, including course availability, credit and activity impacts. Amber Nielsen said families were told some sports would no longer count for PE credit and that change could reduce participation in programs such as swim. Matt Lofgren, who said he volunteers at the school, pointed to a petition with approximately 900 signatures opposing the rollout.
District staff and a principal who spoke in public comment also had mixed input. Casey Baxter, principal of Franklin Accelerated Academy East Campus, praised the district's new ParentSquare communication tool as a benefit to family engagement. The district later announced in the meeting that ParentSquare will become the district's single communication platform beginning in July.
Board members repeatedly told speakers they had heard the concerns and that the district would provide additional information. Several board members and administrators said they planned to assemble more formal review and engagement processes for any major scheduling or programmatic changes.
The concerns raised during public comment followed board and administrative discussion elsewhere in the meeting about pilot implementations of block scheduling and college-and-career academies at several district high schools. The transcript shows multiple parents and staff asking for clear descriptions of what students would learn, how courses map to graduation requirements and whether there would be opt-out options for non-required electives.
The board did not take an immediate vote on Mountain View program changes during the meeting. Instead, the public comment and board discussion concluded with members directing further review and engagement, and with multiple speakers asking the board to publish the district's internal reports and data underlying the planned changes.
Ending
Speakers asked the board to place the issue on a future agenda for formal consideration; several parents asked specifically for a board vote or a formal requirement that major schedule changes require documented parent and teacher approval. The district signaled it would gather more information and proceed with additional outreach before expanding the model.

