Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Midway reviews FY2026 draft budget as transfers to capital fall

2769627 · March 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council and staff reviewed the first draft of the FY2026 budget and flagged a shrinking year-end transfer to the CIP. Staff said prior years saw transfers of $1–2 million but the draft now projects roughly $153,000; members discussed revenue pressure from lower new-home counts and rising wage costs.

Midway City Council members and staff on Monday reviewed the first draft of the fiscal year 2026 budget and identified a materially smaller projected transfer to the city's capital improvement program (CIP).

Staff said the city historically moved large year-end surpluses into CIP 'sometimes $1 million to $2 million'but the current draft projects a transfer of about $153,000 if the budget is spent as written. Staff attributed the decline to a combination of slower development-driven revenue and higher wages and benefits.

The finance staff explained that general fund revenue is primarily taxes, licenses and permits, road money and reimbursements; any year-end excess typically is moved into CIP and PTIF accounts as a form of savings. Council members and staff noted that new-home projections have fallen from earlier years (examples cited: 83, 70 and 90 home-years previously compared with an assumed 60-home year in the draft), and that a further drop below 60 would reduce impact-fee revenue that helps fund CIP projects.

Councilors asked whether the city had been carrying project budgets forward in prior years rather than generating true surpluses; staff said both factors have operated: projects budgeted but not completed produced funds rolled into CIP, and some years had genuine year-end excess. The group discussed the difference between a one-year timing carryforward and a structural surplus.

Members asked staff to look for places to make conservative assumptions and to prepare for a tighter CIP: when asked what the city could reasonably expect to transfer to CIP this year if current trends hold, staff repeated the $153,000 estimate. Councilors instructed staff to continue refining revenue assumptions and to flag items that could be deferred or reduced to protect reserves.

Ending: Council agreed to continue revisions; staff will return with updated revenue estimates and proposed line-item adjustments at the next budget workshop.