Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prince George board finds BrightView clinic noncompliant with local approval, declines to endorse state licensure application
Summary
County attorney told the board BrightView's state licensure application to dispense substance-use medications conflicted with the 2022 special exception (hours of operation) and noted a business-license timing discrepancy; the board approved a resolution stating the application did not comply with local conditions.
Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Supervisors voted to adopt a resolution finding that BrightView's state licensure application to dispense substance-use medications did not comply with local approvals, citing differences between the clinic's stated operations and the terms of a 2022 special exception.
County Attorney Christie Arard told the board that BrightView was granted a special exception in 2022 as a special-care facility with specified hours (8 a.m. to 7 p.m.), but the licensure application lists staffing that begins at 6:30 a.m. Arard also noted a technical noncompliance: the business opened on Dec. 8, 2022 but did not obtain a local business license until Dec. 20, 2022. Arard presented a resolution the board could adopt to report that the application does not comply with the special-exception conditions.
Why this matters: the county's statement is part of the statutorily required local input in the state licensure process for facilities dispensing controlled medications. Supervisors raised concerns about safety and about ensuring local conditions are met before facilities expand dispensing on-site.
Board members questioned the hours discrepancy and the licensing timing and expressed caution about dispensing and distribution of medications on site. No BrightView representative appeared at the meeting to answer questions. The county attorney reminded the board that although the board is making a statement about local compliance, the state regulator will make the ultimate licensing decision; the board also retains local zoning enforcement authority and could pursue revocation of the special exception if conditions are not met.
The board approved the resolution that notes the two local noncompliance items; the motion passed by roll call. Staff said any further actions (including enforcement or revocation) would follow standard zoning enforcement procedures if noncompliance persists.
