Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Wastewater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Prince George faces $80M24 124M bill for business-park wastewater; board racing state grant deadline
Summary
County utilities staff briefed the Board of Supervisors on two costly alternatives to provide wastewater capacity for the county's business park, laying out a multi-phased plan that could require tens of millions of dollars in capital work and long-term operating commitments.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Wastewater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County utilities staff briefed the Board of Supervisors on two costly alternatives to provide wastewater capacity for the county's business park, laying out a multi-phased plan that could require tens of millions of dollars in capital work and long-term operating commitments.
Utilities staff presented the two options: a roughly 10-mile force-main to the City of Hopewell, which would require improvements at Hopewell's plant and could, depending on ammonia-permit requirements, push total capital-plus-operating cost estimates as high as $124 million over the planning horizon; or a roughly 14-mile pipeline to the Sussex Service Authority (Blackwater Swamp treatment plant), which would require an estimated $80 million in early capital for a phased plant expansion and about $1 million a year in operating costs in the near term.
Why this matters: the business park master plan anticipates up to 5 MGD (million gallons per day) of wastewater capacity. Without a decision, the county cannot secure capacity commitments or finalize funding, and board members noted developers and prospects will not commit without certainty.
Staff described the technical picture: a single large pump station could cost about $10 million; force-main pipe estimates range from roughly $32 million (about 10 miles) to about $40 million (about 14 miles). The City of Hopewell indicated primary clarifier work could cost $8 million to $13 million; DEQ ammonia limits remain unresolved and could add significant, currently unquantified costs. By contrast, Sussex Service Authority would need a plant expansion (a 4 MGD first-phase build was discussed), producing a combined capital estimate near $80 million and lower annual operating costs (staff estimated about $1 million annually for the Sussex option versus $32$4 million annually for Hopewell at initial build-out assumptions).
Board members pressed staff on payback and economic return. Staff said utility-rate recovery alone would take decades on a 30-year debt service schedule and framed the investment as an economic-development decision intended to expand industrial tax base and bring new jobs. Supervisors also noted a state offer of $10 million for wastewater infrastructure; staff said the state required an agreement demonstrating capacity for at least 2 MGD by an early-April deadline, and staff are seeking additional time and more definitive cost work from Hopewell and Sussex before committing.
Next steps: staff said more detailed cost estimates and rate analyses are needed, and recommended pursuing grant or developer funding to reduce the utility budget burden. The board did not adopt a binding plan at the meeting and asked staff to return with clarified capital estimates, operating rates, and the status of the state grant timeline.
