Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Obscenity And Public Performances topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes bill restricting "adult performances" that contain "obscene material" after heated debate
Summary
The Oklahoma House passed legislation that criminalizes certain public "adult performances" containing obscene material and allows political subdivisions to bar those performances from public spaces where minors are present; lawmakers were sharply divided in an emotionally charged debate.
The Oklahoma House passed House Bill 12-17 on Tuesday in a 79-17 vote after intense floor debate in which supporters said the bill protects children from adult performances they consider "obscene" and opponents argued the measure targets drag performers and threatens free expression.
Representative West Kevin, the bill's sponsor, told the chamber the measure does not single out any specific group: "The word does not appear one time in this legislation," he said, referring to the term "drag." The legislation makes it unlawful for a political subdivision to permit an adult performance that contains "obscene material" in a public place where minors could be exposed, and it directs local permitting authorities to ensure age-verified or restricted venues for otherwise lawful adult-only performances.
Opponents characterized the bill as a vehicle for broader social targeting. "This bill is dishonest," Representative McCain said on the floor, arguing the state's existing obscenity statutes already prohibit public acts that are patently offensive. Several members said the bill duplicates or conflicts with current law and could chill protected expression.
Key elements
- Makes it unlawful for a person to "engage in an adult performance which contains obscene material" in a public place where a minor of the general public may be exposed to the performance. - Permits political subdivisions to adopt permitting systems and age-verification requirements for events to avoid exposing minors. - Uses existing legal standards for obscenity, including references to Title 21, Section 1024.1 (statutory obscene-material definitions) and contemporary community standards.
Floor debate and concerns
Supporters argued the bill fills a gap by giving local governments clearer authority to prevent minors from being exposed to performances that meet the statutory obscenity standard. Representative West Kevin told the House the bill "will absolutely help to protect children" and that events would still be allowed in age-restricted venues.
Opponents said the state already has obscenity laws that apply to public performances and warned the bill could be used to target LGBTQ events. Representative McCain, a frequent opponent, accused backers of repackaging anti-LGBTQ policy and urged members to reject the measure. Representative Bennett recited a famous poem about the dangers of eroding rights to emphasize free-speech concerns.
Vote and outcome
Final passage: House Bill 12-17 passed the House, 79 yes, 17 no.
What's next
The bill will advance to the Senate. Sponsors said it clarifies local authority to condition public permits and reduce the likelihood that events exposing minors to obscene material will occur in public spaces. Opponents said existing laws already cover most of the conduct in question and warned about the measure's potential to chill constitutionally protected expression.
Ending
The floor debate made clear the political intensity surrounding public-performance and obscenity law; the measure passed with strong support from the majority caucus and strong opposition from the minority caucus, setting up a likely high-profile review in the Senate.
