Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rules Of Procedure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews seating, vice-mayor rotation and notice rules in draft procedures; asks staff to clarify 3/4 threshold and posting language

2766666 · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

As part of a rules-of-procedure review, Fountain Hills councilors asked staff to make explicit that a three-quarter threshold equals six votes when the council has seven members; they also discussed vice-mayor rotation, timing for agenda materials, and whether to remove a definition of "newspaper" after citing Arizona law.

Fountain Hills Town Council members reviewed several operational items in the draft rules of procedure, including the role and seating of the mayor, the formula and length of rotation for the vice mayor role, and vote thresholds for actions requiring a three-quarter majority.

Council members asked staff to make explicit language in the draft clarifying that a three-quarter vote on a seven-member council requires six affirmative votes. One council member said, "You have to round up in the event that there's, so if if 5 doesn't pass the threshold, then you go up to 6," and another asked that the document state "6" definitively to avoid future uncertainty.

On vice mayor rotation, staff noted an existing practice and asked whether the rotation length should be codified. After discussion staff said they would confirm whether the rotation is seven or eight months; at one point the group agreed that "It is 8 months. It's in our code." Council members also asked to include a clearer statement on the mayor's formal role and the seating arrangement currently used in practice.

Councilors discussed definitions used in the draft, including a proposed definition of "newspaper" for public posting. Several council members questioned whether the word should remain in the code after staff checked state law. Staff referenced Arizona Revised Statutes 38-431.02 (notice of meetings) and said that statute does not currently require a newspaper posting; several councilors recommended removing or aligning local language with the state statute.

On agenda and packet timing, staff proposed shifting several submission deadlines that were written for a prior meeting schedule (Thursday meetings) so materials do not fall on a weekend. Councilors agreed the packet timing language should be updated and asked staff to return redlined language clarifying deadlines for agenda items and handouts; the council accepted a staff suggestion that handouts be submitted to the town clerk no later than 24 hours before the meeting for dissemination.

What happens next: staff will update the draft rules to (a) state explicitly that a three-quarter threshold on a seven-member board equals six votes, (b) confirm and codify vice-mayor rotation timing, (c) align publication/posting language with A.R.S. 38-431.02 or remove the "newspaper" definition, and (d) return packet and handout timing to avoid weekend cutoffs.