Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Library Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Finance narrows State Library funding cuts after public outcry, shifts $300,000 cut to DNCR
Summary
The House Finance Committee debated defunding and staff reductions at the State Library before rejecting an outright elimination and instead approving a $300,000-a-year back-of-the-budget reduction applied to the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources budget after amendments and votes.
The House Finance Committee on March 19 considered proposals to dramatically reduce funding for the State Library and to eliminate an unclassified state librarian position, then moved instead to a smaller, department-level reduction.
The Library drew extended debate after Representative Sweeney proposed eliminating a currently vacant unclassified state librarian position and a separate funded vacant position and cutting $100,000 a year. After discussion and public correspondence noted by members, the committee voted down the targeted elimination of the two funded vacant positions and instead approved a $300,000-per-year back-of-the-budget reduction applied to DNCR (Department of Natural and Cultural Resources).
Representative McGuire, chair of the House Finance Committee, framed the choice as one of prioritization across safety and cultural services, saying supervisors of rangers and firefighters have greater immediate public-safety priority than some library positions. Representative Veil and others opposed removing the state librarian appointment authority, arguing the state needs a governor-appointed state librarian and that the library provides statewide services such as interlibrary loan and Libby digital lending.
Representative Sweeney said he would not press to fully eliminate the library and acknowledged federal library program funding risks; he supported a narrower approach that removes two funded but vacant positions. Commissioner Stewart (Department of Natural and Cultural Resources) and DNCR staff provided alternative personnel adjustments and a small package of position swaps that produced roughly $40,000 in net savings before the committee’s final amendment.
The committee first voted on removing two specific funded vacant positions (motion failed, 4–5). Members then voted to substitute a broader approach: a $300,000-per-year general-fund reduction targeted to DNCR for the biennium (motion passed, 5–4). The committee also approved a separate DNCR request to shift certain funded/unfunded positions (a net small savings) by unanimous voice vote.
The accepted back-of-the-budget cut leaves DNCR leadership some discretion to allocate the reduction across departmental accounts, but several committee members urged the panel and the commissioner to protect front-line park and fire supervisory positions. Committee members also noted the likelihood that federal funds the library receives could decline and that the legislature may need to revisit library services if federal funding is reduced.
The committee recorded the $300,000-per-year reduction as the compromise outcome; members opposed to the shift said they would have preferred that the department as a whole receive a broader back-of-the-budget instruction rather than singling out library accounts.
Votes at a glance: motion to remove two funded vacant library positions — failed 4–5; motion to apply a DNCR-level back-of-the-budget reduction of $300,000/year — passed 5–4.
Looking ahead, committee members said they expect further discussion in the budget process if federal library funds are removed and asked DNCR to return with options that protect safety and program continuity.
