Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission recommends rezoning, preliminary plat for 100-home Holland Homes subdivision to City Council

2766254 · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Norton Planning Commission voted to recommend that City Council consider rezoning roughly 50 acres on Cleveland-Massillon Road from RU1 to R3 with RPC cluster exceptions and to forward a preliminary plat for a roughly 100-lot subdivision; commissioners and neighbors debated wetlands, an on-site oil well, traffic and buffers.

The Norton Planning Commission voted to recommend that City Council consider rezoning about 50 acres on Cleveland-Massillon Road from RU1 (single-family) to R3 (single-family) with a Plan Cluster Residential (RPC) overlay and to forward a preliminary subdivision plat for what the applicant describes as a roughly 100-lot residential development known on the filings as “Holland Homes.”

The recommendation, which does not itself change zoning or approve construction, will be considered by City Council in a public hearing. The commission’s rezone motion passed 3–2; the preliminary site-plan recommendation passed 4–1.

The rezoning and preliminary-plat requests drew extended public comment from neighbors who said the property contains wetlands, springs and an oil well and expressed concern about runoff, sewer and traffic. Commissioners and the applicant discussed code requirements, buffers and the need for engineering and regulatory review.

Dan Steiger, the applicant’s representative, told the commission the plan pairs R3 with the RPC overlay and that the sketches submitted “are in accordance with the code.” Steiger said the site plan is “relatively low density” compared with the acreage and emphasized the applicant’s intention to preserve green space while developing single-family lots.

Residents who live adjacent to the property urged caution. “Where does that spring water go?” asked Rebecca Kuzmic, a former owner of property on Reimer Road, referring to a pond and springs visible on historic maps of the site. June Guzzo, whose property borders the proposed subdivision, described prior drainage changes and said recent excavations sent water onto her land: “It’s like a waterfall. And my land is totally underwater.” Sarah Justice, another nearby resident, said tree removal on the parcel has already changed local drainage and warned that past assurances from city engineers had not prevented flooding on neighboring land.

Commissioners and staff repeatedly said final engineering, including a stormwater management plan and a traffic study, will be required before any final plat or building permits are approved. The commission’s zoning administrator noted that an engineering review will be required and that the city engineer asked specifically for a traffic study, which the applicant acknowledged.

Commission discussion also focused on how the RPC overlay interacts with permitted uses in the city code. A member reading the municipal code cited section 1272.03 to describe the RPC provisions, and other commissioners emphasized that an RPC designation allows applicants to request special exceptions listed in the code, not automatic approval of every listed use.

Commissioners divided on broader policy about cluster development in Norton. One commissioner asked colleagues to consider whether widespread RPC approvals would change the city’s character, which has historically favored larger lots; another commissioner said the proposal meets a recognized demand for more moderately sized housing and could provide desirable housing stock for younger or “step-up” buyers.

Procedurally, the Planning Commission’s action was a recommendation to City Council. The commission’s roll-call vote on the rezone was: Mrs. Witzberger — yes; Mr. Dowling — yes; Mr. Coughlin — no; Mr. Peterson — yes; Mr. Leita — no (3 yes, 2 no). On the preliminary site plan (SPR 4 20 25) the commission voted: Mrs. Witzberger — yes; Mr. Peterson — yes; Mr. Dowling — yes; Mr. Coughlin — yes; Mr. Leita — no (4 yes, 1 no).

The applicant said the plan anticipates three retention basins and that stormwater designs will be sized during engineering review to reduce off-site impacts. The applicant also said some of the mapped green space on the plan is undevelopable wetlands and that Ohio EPA and, if applicable, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would have roles in any wetland permitting. On sewer, a resident asked whether sewer service would be extended from Wadsworth Road; staff and the applicant said sewer connections and grading will be determined during engineering review and as required by county or city utilities.

Next steps: both items will appear on the Norton City Council agenda for public hearings. Council makes the final zoning decision and approves final plats and engineering conditions before permits are issued.

Votes at a glance

- Rezone (RU1 → R3 with RPC overlay) — Recommendation to City Council: Passed, 3–2 (Witzberger, Dowling, Peterson yes; Coughlin, Leita no). Note: City Council will hold public hearings and make the final decision.

- Preliminary subdivision plat (SPR 4 20 25) — Recommendation to City Council: Passed, 4–1 (Witzberger, Peterson, Dowling, Coughlin yes; Leita no). Note: Final approval requires engineering, stormwater, traffic study, and other agency permits before a final plat or building permits.