Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Mendocino supervisors debate whether to weigh in on AB 263 to extend emergency flow rules for Scott and Shasta rivers
Summary
The Board of Supervisors heard extensive public comment both supporting and opposing Assembly Bill 263, which would keep emergency in‑stream flow regulations in effect for the Scott and Shasta watersheds until permanent rules are adopted. Supervisors expressed concern about precedent and local control and took no final vote.
The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors heard a lengthy public discussion on Assembly Bill 263 (AB 263) and did not take a position at the meeting.
Supervisor Williams introduced the item as a request to transmit a letter of support for AB 263, saying the bill aims to protect minimum in‑stream flows on the Scott and Shasta rivers to safeguard salmon runs and tribal cultural practices. "When minimum water flows are not protected, salmon die," Williams said, adding that the issue touches tribal heritage and local economies.
Public commenters and organizational representatives presented competing views. Adam Gaska of the Mendocino County Farm Bureau urged the board to oppose the bill, saying AB 263 would circumvent the State Water Resources Control Board’s existing rule‑making and public process for setting in‑stream flows. "This process allows different interests, stakeholders, and…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
