Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears bill to add standardized election definitions

2766230 · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sen. Shelly Vance introduced Senate Bill 360 to place common election terminology into statute; clerks and recorders backed the idea while members asked for clarity on terms such as "overvote" and "ballot number variance."

Sen. Shelly Vance, sponsor of Senate Bill 360, told the House State Administration Committee the bill would place commonly used election terms into Montana law to reduce confusion among voters, candidates and administrators.

"Definitions are essential," Sen. Vance said in her opening remarks, arguing that clearer statutory language would improve consistency, implementation and public confidence in elections.

The bill drew support from the Montana Association of Clerk and Recorders. Regina Plettenberg, speaking online for the association, said: "These are terms that we use often ... and it'll be good to have it defined in law so that ... we're all on the same page." Plettenberg added that the definitions would help county election officials coordinate and communicate with the public.

Committee members focused questions on specific definitions. Representative Byrne asked whether the bill's definition of "overvote" covered two different situations: when an individual ballot records more selections than allowed and when the tabulator shows more ballots counted than the number of voters. Sen. Vance and other sponsors clarified that in the bill "overvote" refers to an individual ballot where a voter marks more choices than permitted; the separate issue of the tabulator or ballot-count discrepancies is addressed elsewhere in the draft under "ballot number variance." Representatives pressed for clearer, distinct terms so election officials and the public would distinguish between mis-marked ballots and aggregate count discrepancies.

No formal action was taken; the sponsor said she would be available for questions and reserved the right to close at a later date. The hearing record shows proponents on the topic and committee discussion but no vote or amendment recorded during this session.

The bill remains at the hearing stage pending further committee deliberations.