Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Certification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teachers testify as bill would limit adaptive physical education certification requirement to new hires
Summary
Providence physical‑education teachers and the bill sponsor told the House Education Committee that a local shift requiring adaptive certification led to displacement notices for long‑time teachers. Representative O'Brien's bill would make the requirement prospective for new hires, protecting incumbent teachers nearing retirement.
Representative O'Brien introduced House Bill 5,602 to make the adaptive physical education certification requirement prospective for new hires rather than retroactive for long‑time teachers.
"It's a simple bill," Representative O'Brien said, urging that the requirement apply prospectively so teachers who are near retirement would not have to spend time and money on a new certificate. "They're on a yearly basis. They can be displaced at any time. Right. But not but there's only like 15 teachers in the whole school district who don't have it," he said, describing the Providence context.
Multiple Providence physical‑education teachers testified that in March 2024 they received displacement letters after the district began enforcing an adaptive certification expectation. Rick Sunderland, who said he has taught 31 years in Providence, told the committee: "All of us received a displacement letter from the school department. The letter stated that we were no longer qualified to work in opposition because we do not hold an adaptive certification. This decision seemed to be arbitrary and capricious. All of us were blindsided by this letter, and our lives and careers were turned upside down." He asked that incumbents be grandfathered so they can finish their careers without returning to college near retirement age.
Brian Keeler and David Nyblom, long‑time Providence teachers, echoed that the district previously relied on a roaming adaptive teacher and building‑level arrangements. Keeler said professional development opportunities to obtain the endorsement had not been provided over the years: "There was many a times where we could have this couldn't have been an issue. But they never really gave it to us." Nyblom said the process of displacement and re‑interviewing had been stressful and that credential pathways and approvals were inconsistent.
Committee members asked education department officials and witnesses whether RIDE requires adaptive certification statewide. An agency representative who spoke toward the end of the hearing stated that RIDE does not require adaptive certification for general certification and that districts retain authority over local staffing choices. That representative said they would follow up and work with members.
What the bill would change: Representative O'Brien said the bill would require the adaptive certification only for new hires after a prospective effective date (the bill text cited July 1 as a prospective marker). Several witnesses asked the committee to allow incumbents to complete their careers without the extra expense of additional graduate work and to consider district practices that had relied on roaming specialists.
Testimony and context: Witnesses estimated about 15 Providence teachers were affected by displacement notices. Several witnesses described the time and cost burden of returning to college for a certification late in their careers. Committee members expressed concern and asked RIDE and Providence officials to clarify the pathway and whether a district mandate had been applied without broad notice.
Ending: The committee heard testimony and said it would follow up with RIDE to clarify certification rules and local district practices. No committee vote on House Bill 5,602 was recorded in the hearing transcript.
