Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Douglas County updates household-pet resolution to align with state cruelty definitions and expand enforcement options
Summary
The board approved amendments to Resolution R19-029 on control and licensing of household pets to add and clarify definitions (including minor injury), extend leash-control parameters, add cats to licensing and rabies requirements, modify noise standards, and clarify impoundment and permit procedures.
The Douglas County Board of County Commissioners approved an amendment to Resolution R19-029, the county92s control and licensing resolution for household pets, updating definitions and enforcement procedures to better align with current law and local practice.
Commander Allen Stanton of the Douglas County Sheriff92s Office introduced the proposal and said the sheriff92s office contracts animal control services to the Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region. Sergeant Brianna Munns, animal law enforcement sergeant employed by the Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region, summarized the specific changes requested.
What changed: Proposed and approved amendments include moving definitions for abandonment and shelter into the definitions section; modifying the definitions of "at-risk animal," "proper enclosure," and "control"; adding a definition for "minor injury" (an injury that does not require immediate medical attention); increasing the noisy-household-pet threshold from 10 to 20 minutes of relatively continuous barking; and adding cats to the licensing requirement while requiring rabies vaccination for both cats and dogs.
Munns told the board the proposed change to "control" would allow dogs to be walked on a 10-foot leash to provide owners "adequate control over their dog to better ensure public safety." She also explained changes to impoundment and disposition language to clarify animal-control officers92 authority and the financial obligations of pet owners; the amendment clarifies that a court-ordered potentially dangerous-animal permit terminates after two years unless otherwise specified by the court and specifies that permit payment is to be made at the Douglas County Sheriff92s Office records division.
The amendment also proposes removing language that allowed dangerous animals to be moved outside the county, reasoning that relocation does not eliminate the public-safety threat, and proposes moving abandonment and neglect violations to the potentially dangerous-animal fine schedule.
Public comment: Kim Greer of Larkspur asked about the precise threshold for "minor injury." Munns replied that the proposed definition would cover scratches or bruises that do not require immediate medical attention.
Action: Motion to approve the amendment carried unanimously.
The board described the updates as a thoughtful and measured change intended to give animal-control officers clearer authority and to better protect public safety and animal welfare.
