Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission declines zoning text amendment that would have excluded certain county emergency towers from standard public review
Summary
After extended debate about public input, disclosure and public-safety needs, the Maury County Commission voted to reject a zoning text amendment that would have allowed certain government-owned emergency communications towers to bypass normal public review and exceptions.
The Maury County Commission on March 17 voted against a proposed amendment to the county zoning rules that would have created an exclusion for certain public-safety communications towers owned or operated by Maury County and other specified public entities.
The amendment would have added a provision to the zoning resolution allowing county-owned emergency communications facilities to proceed without the special-exception public hearing process used for other tower permits. Proponents said the change reflected the county’s need to deploy critical communications infrastructure without the delays and litigation risk that can follow public appeals.
"The current method by which we have it being approved is cumbersome and puts the county in a difficult situation," county counsel explained on the record when advocates discussed legal exposure and prior litigation examples. Several commissioners and the county’s planning staff noted other jurisdictions use similar provisions for emergency infrastructure.
Opponents said the amendment would remove an important avenue for public input and would allow the county to avoid site review that neighbors rely on to raise concerns. "The people should have an opportunity to voice, and to have a voice," Commissioner Howard said, urging commissioners not to remove public hearings for what would benefit county government. Commissioner Howard described the proposal as "bad policy."
After a motion to send the change back to the planning commission for a required public-comment process failed to gain traction, the commission took a final vote on the text amendment and the tally resulted in a tie situation with the motion failing on an even split. The chairman declared the zoning text amendment defeated.
County staff and planning commissioners had recommended the text change; commissioners asked staff to review alternatives that would preserve public input while addressing time-sensitive public-safety deployments.
